3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Tax Consequences of Legal Cannabis

      1 , 2
      Canadian Public Policy
      University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We explore the tax revenue consequences of legalizing recreational cannabis in Canada. We build, calibrate, and simulate a two-level nested demand model in which legal and illegal cannabis are differentiated products and that incorporates econometric estimates of critical parameters. First, we find that sales tax and excise tax revenues accruing from legalization may be fully offset by declines in revenues from alcohol and tobacco. Second, and in contrast to excise and sales tax revenue, new revenue will accrue from personal income and corporate profits taxes. Using some available information on the wage structure of cannabis-producing corporations and imposing a Pareto distribution on incomes within the industry, we obtain an estimate of personal income tax revenues. To compute corporate profits tax revenue, we use priors on labour and capital shares and simulate the results of assumptions of debt leverage. We also estimate the private dollar value of legalization to individuals using a utility function approach. Per user, our results suggest a value roughly equal to $500 per annum. The results of this study may carry over to high-sin-tax economies contemplating legalization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Variation in cannabis potency and prices in a newly legal market: evidence from 30 million cannabis sales in Washington state

          Aims To (1) assess trends and variation in the market share of product types and potency sold in a legal cannabis retail market, and (2) estimate how potency and purchase quantity influence price variation for cannabis flower. Design Secondary analysis of publicly available data from Washington State’s cannabis traceability system spanning July 7, 2014 to September 30, 2016. Descriptive statistics and linear regressions assessed variation and trends in cannabis product variety and potency. Hedonic regressions estimated how purchase quantity and potency influence cannabis flower price variation. Setting Washington State, USA. Participants (1) 44,482,176 million cannabis purchases, including (2) 31,052,123 cannabis flower purchases after trimming price and quantity outliers. Measurements Primary outcome measures were (1) monthly expenditures on cannabis, total delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration, and cannabidiol (CBD) concentration by product type; and (2) excise-tax-inclusive price per gram of cannabis flower. Key covariates for the hedonic price regressions included quantity purchased, THC, and CBD. Findings Traditional cannabis flowers still account for the majority of spending (66.6%), but the market share of extracts for inhalation increased by 145.8% between October 2014 and September 2016, now composing 21.2% of sales. The average THC-level for cannabis extracts is more than triple that for cannabis flowers (68.7% compared to 20.6%). For flower products, there is a statistically significant relationship between price per gram and both THC [coefficient = 0.012; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.011 to 0.013] and CBD [coefficient = 0.017; CI = 0.015 to 0.019]. The estimated discount elasticity is −0.06 [CI = −0.07 to −0.05]. Conclusions In the state of Washington, USA, the legal cannabis market is currently dominated by high-THC cannabis flower, and features growing expenditures on extracts. For cannabis flower, both THC and CBD are associated with higher per-gram prices, and there are small but significant quantity discounts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Medical Marijuana Laws, Traffic Fatalities, and Alcohol Consumption

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Cannabidiol reduces cigarette consumption in tobacco smokers: Preliminary findings

              The role of the endocannabinoid system in nicotine addiction is being increasingly acknowledged. We conducted a pilot, randomised double blind placebo controlled study set out to assess the impact of the ad-hoc use of cannabidiol (CBD) in smokers who wished to stop smoking. 24 smokers were randomised to receive an inhaler of CBD (n=12) or placebo (n=12) for one week, they were instructed to use the inhaler when they felt the urge to smoke. Over the treatment week, placebo treated smokers showed no differences in number of cigarettes smoked. In contrast, those treated with CBD significantly reduced the number of cigarettes smoked by ~40% during treatment. Results also indicated some maintenance of this effect at follow-up. These preliminary data, combined with the strong preclinical rationale for use of this compound, suggest CBD to be a potential treatment for nicotine addiction that warrants further exploration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Canadian Public Policy
                Canadian Public Policy
                University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
                0317-0861
                1911-9917
                September 01 2020
                September 01 2020
                : 46
                : 3
                : 305-322
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Economics, Concordia University, Montreal
                [2 ]Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado, Boulder
                Article
                10.3138/cpp.2019-062
                6d9aea10-54a9-452d-a044-4d1df555bbfd
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article