1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Intermittent use of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis in adults

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d37477492e147">Current clinical recommendations suggest that continuous treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis with biologic agents is more effective than intermittent treatment in terms of achieving remission and maintaining it. Intermittent treatment, however, may provide an alternative approach in patients unwilling or unable to maintain a continuous regimen, such as those who would prefer a 'treatment vacation' after achieving long-term remission, those who require treatment cessation owing to adverse events, and where insurance arrangements do not provide sufficient cover for continuous treatment. We conducted a literature search of PubMed to identify publications reporting data on the efficacy and safety of intermittent treatment with biologic agents in adults with psoriasis, specifically the use of inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept and infliximab), interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 (ustekinumab), IL-23 (guselkumab) and IL-17 (brodalumab, ixekizumab and secukinumab). From our search, we identified 18 relevant publications reporting the intermittent use of the biologic therapies of interest: five described etanercept, three described adalimumab, two each described infliximab, ixekizumab or ustekinumab, and one each described certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, brodalumab and secukinumab. In general, there were large proportions of patients (≥60%) who were able to re-establish disease control (as defined by each study) following re-treatment, and the safety profiles of the various agents during re-treatment were as anticipated from their profiles observed during continuous dosing. The exception to these general findings was infliximab, which showed the lowest rate of efficacy-endpoint achievement (25% and 38% in two dosing groups evaluated) as well as a higher incidence of adverse infusion reactions compared with continuous dosing. In conclusion, the use of biologic agents in psoriasis is changing and current clinical data suggest that intermittent treatment may provide an effective and well-tolerated option for certain patients. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
          J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
          Wiley
          0926-9959
          1468-3083
          February 2021
          August 31 2020
          February 2021
          : 35
          : 2
          : 360-367
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences Dubai UAE
          [2 ]Dermamed Clinic Dubai Dubai UAE
          [3 ]Division of Dermatology Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City Abu Dhabi UAE
          [4 ]College of Medicine &amp; Health Sciences Khalifa University Abu Dhabi UAE
          [5 ]Dermatology Department Hospital Houssay Buenos Aires Argentina
          [6 ]Department of Dermatology National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine Taipei Taiwan
          [7 ]Pfizer Gulf Dubai UAE
          Article
          10.1111/jdv.16803
          32639047
          6c8a9238-fc70-47a9-9bfa-e94121f1bec4
          © 2021

          http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

          http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article