56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dynamic m 6A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The most abundant mRNA post-transcriptional modification is N 6-methyladenosine (m 6A) that has broad roles in RNA biology 1- 5 . In mammalian cells, the asymmetric distribution of m 6A along mRNAs leaves relatively less methylation in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) compared to other regions 6, 7 . However, whether and how 5′UTR methylation is regulated is poorly understood. Despite the crucial role of the 5′UTR in translation initiation, very little is known whether m 6A modification influences mRNA translation. Here we show that in response to heat shock stress, m 6A is preferentially deposited to the 5′UTR of newly transcribed mRNAs. We found that the dynamic 5′UTR methylation is a result of stress-induced nuclear localization of YTHDF2, a well characterized m 6A “reader”. Upon heat shock stress, the nuclear YTHDF2 preserves 5′UTR methylation of stress-induced transcripts by limiting the m 6A “eraser” FTO from demethylation. Remarkably, the increased 5′UTR methylation in the form of m 6A promotes cap-independent translation initiation, providing a mechanism for selective mRNA translation under heat shock stress. Using Hsp70 mRNA as an example, we demonstrate that a single site m 6A modification in the 5′UTR enables translation initiation independent of the 5′ end m 7G cap. The elucidation of the dynamic feature of 5′UTR methylation and its critical role in cap-independent translation not only expands the breadth of physiological roles of m 6A, but also uncovers a previously unappreciated translational control mechanism in heat shock response.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The heat shock response: life on the verge of death.

          Organisms must survive a variety of stressful conditions, including sudden temperature increases that damage important cellular structures and interfere with essential functions. In response to heat stress, cells activate an ancient signaling pathway leading to the transient expression of heat shock or heat stress proteins (Hsps). Hsps exhibit sophisticated protection mechanisms, and the most conserved Hsps are molecular chaperones that prevent the formation of nonspecific protein aggregates and assist proteins in the acquisition of their native structures. In this Review, we summarize the concepts of the protective Hsp network. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease.

            To dampen proteotoxic stresses and maintain protein homeostasis, organisms possess a stress-responsive molecular machinery that detects and neutralizes protein damage. A prominent feature of stressed cells is the increased synthesis of heat shock proteins (Hsps) that aid in the refolding of misfolded peptides and restrain protein aggregation. Transcriptional activation of the heat shock response is orchestrated by heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), which rapidly translocates to hsp genes and induces their expression. Although the role of HSF1 in protecting cells and organisms against severe stress insults is well established, many aspects of how HSF1 senses qualitatively and quantitatively different forms of stresses have remained poorly understood. Moreover, recent discoveries that HSF1 controls life span have prompted new ways of thinking about an old transcription factor. Here, we review the established role of HSF1 in counteracting cell stress and prospect the role of HSF1 as a regulator of disease states and aging.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CHIP-mediated stress recovery by sequential ubiquitination of substrates and Hsp70.

              Exposure of cells to various stresses often leads to the induction of a group of proteins called heat shock proteins (HSPs, molecular chaperones). Hsp70 is one of the most highly inducible molecular chaperones, but its expression must be maintained at low levels under physiological conditions to permit constitutive cellular activities to proceed. Heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) is the transcriptional regulator of HSP gene expression, but it remains poorly understood how newly synthesized HSPs return to basal levels when HSF1 activity is attenuated. CHIP (carboxy terminus of Hsp70-binding protein), a dual-function co-chaperone/ubiquitin ligase, targets a broad range of chaperone substrates for proteasomal degradation. Here we show that CHIP not only enhances Hsp70 induction during acute stress but also mediates its turnover during the stress recovery process. Central to this dual-phase regulation is its substrate dependence: CHIP preferentially ubiquitinates chaperone-bound substrates, whereas degradation of Hsp70 by CHIP-dependent targeting to the ubiquitin-proteasome system occurs when misfolded substrates have been depleted. The sequential catalysis of the CHIP-associated chaperone adaptor and its bound substrate provides an elegant mechanism for maintaining homeostasis by tuning chaperone levels appropriately to reflect the status of protein folding within the cytoplasm.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                3 August 2015
                12 October 2015
                22 October 2015
                29 April 2016
                : 526
                : 7574
                : 591-594
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                [2 ]Graduate Field of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                [3 ]Graduate Field of Genetics, Genomics & Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence and request for materials should be addressed to S.-B.Q. ( sq38@ 123456cornell.edu )
                Article
                NIHMS712495
                10.1038/nature15377
                4851248
                26458103
                6c6f423f-9e69-4c75-b2a3-a733b37bdb3e

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article