28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Distinct stem/progenitor cells proliferate to regenerate the trachea, intrapulmonary airways and alveoli in COVID-19 patients

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, The global pandemic COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected over 6.5 million individuals and claimed over 350,000 lives worldwide within six months. The respiratory epithelial cells covering the airways and alveoli are the major targets of the virus. Moreover, damage to the epithelium can be exacerbated by mechanical ventilation. It is expected that many of the infected individuals that survived the acute phase will develop pulmonary diseases (e.g. fibrosis) if the epithelium fails to regenerate properly. Multiple stem/progenitor cells have been implicated in the regeneration of the respiratory epithelium. The human trachea and intrapulmonary airways are lined by three major cell types, basal, club and ciliated cells, and the alveolar epithelium includes type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) cells. The trachea basal cells have been shown to serve as progenitor cells to self-renew and differentiate into other cell types including club, ciliated cells and minor cell populations (e.g., tuft cells). 1,2 Club cells can also de-differentiate into basal cells to regenerate the tracheal epithelium in a mouse model where basal cells are ablated prior to injury. 3 In the intrapulmonary airways, basal cells have been postulated to serve as progenitor cells for epithelial regeneration in humans (reviewed by 4 ). In mice, however, club cells are responsible for repopulating the intrapulmonary airway epithelium upon injury due to their lack of basal cells in the intrapulmonary airways. 5 The cell of origin for regenerating the alveolar epithelium remains controversial. Multiple cell types have been implicated in the regeneration of the alveolar epithelium depending on injury models. These cells include AT1 and AT2 cells, bronchial-alveolar ductal cells (BASCs), distal airway stem cells (DASCs), lineage negative epithelial precursor (LNEP) cells, bronchial epithelial stem cells (BESCs), and different AT2 subpopulation cells (reviewed by 6 ). Although histology analysis has been performed, it remains unknown which stem/progenitor cell(s) proliferate in response to viral challenges in COVID-19 patients. Cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 depends on the extracellular receptor Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the serine protease transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2). ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are expressed in both nasal and bronchial epithelium as detected by immunohistochemistry. 7 Single cell RNA-sequencing analysis confirmed that ACE2 is enriched in the human airway epithelium including club, ciliated and goblet cells, AT1 and AT2 cells. 8,9 ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are also co-expressed in a subpopulation of ciliated cells and AT2 cells. 8 Consistently, histology characterization revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces severe damages in the intrapulmonary airways and alveoli. 10 However, detailed characterization of different respiratory cell types remains lacking for COVID-19 patients. In this report we showed that ciliated, club, AT1 and AT2 cells are the major cell types damaged by SARS-CoV-2 infection. More importantly, we demonstrated that distinct proliferating cells are present in the trachea/large airways, small airways and alveoli following SARS-CoV-2 infection. We examined tracheas and lungs from five deceased patients with postmortem intervals (PMIs) as low as 2.5 hours. The epithelium was severely damaged in some parts of the trachea (Supplementary information, Fig. S1a, b). Ciliated and club cells were shed into the lumen, and the underlying basal cells were exposed (Fig. 1a, b and data not shown). Although KRT5 remained to be expressed in these exposed basal cells, the nuclei rounded up in contrast to the neighboring basal cells where the overlaying club and ciliated were intact (Supplementary information, Fig. S1c). Intriguingly, although basal cells and other epithelial cells rarely proliferate at homeostasis in the adults, 1 extensive basal cell proliferation was observed in the trachea, especially in the area where club and ciliated cells were damaged (Fig. 1b). The proliferating cells were limited to the immediate parabasal layer in the area where the epithelial integrity was relatively well maintained (Fig. 1a). However, in the severely damaged area, proliferating cells were occasionally observed in the basal layer which is lined by basal cells with round nuclei (Fig. 1b). Together these findings demonstrate that in the trachea basal cells proliferate, likely serving as progenitor cells to regenerate the damaged epithelium following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fig. 1 Distinct proliferating cells in the trachea, intrapulmonary airways and alveoli of COVID-19 patients. a Proliferating basal cells are enriched in the area where severe damages occur. Note Ki67+ cells are limited to the immediate parabasal layer. b Proliferating basal cells are present in the basal (arrowheads) and immediate parabasal layers where the overlaying club and ciliated are depleted. c Proliferating cells in the intrapulmonary airways include basal cells (arrowheads), club cells (long arrows) and KRT5− SCGB1A1− population (arrows). d Extensive proliferating alveolar type 2 cells (arrows). e Schematics of proliferating epithelial cells in COVID-19 trachea and lung. Note the predominant proliferating cells in the small airways are Lineage Negative Proliferating Cells (LNPCs). In this study tracheas and lungs from five COVID-19 patients were examined. Scale bar, 50 µm. We next examined the COVID-19 lungs. The intrapulmonary airways and alveoli were severely damaged with epithelial denudation and extensive intra-alveolar fibrinous exudates (Supplementary information, Fig. S2a). A significant amount of ciliated and club cells were sloughed and detached from basal cells in some areas (Supplementary information, Fig. S2b). In the large airways (diameter > 0.5 mm), 82% of Ki67+ cells co-express KRT5 (Supplementary information, Fig. S3a), suggesting that basal cell remains to be the major proliferative cell population in response to viral challenge. By contrast, in the small airways (diameter < 0.5 mm) although 29.08% ± 2.93% of basal cells showed Ki67 expression, the majority of proliferating epithelial cells were KRT5− (4.10% ± 1.53% SCGB1A1+ KRT5− and 66.82% ± 3.31% SCGB1A1− KRT5−). Goblet cells (MUC5AC+) and ciliated cells (FOXJ1+) were not proliferative (Supplementary information, Fig. S3a and data not shown, n = 5). Although a previous study showed that approximately 1% to 2% of neuroendocrine cells are proliferative, 11 we did not observe any Ki67+ neuroendocrine cells (Synaptophysin, SYP+) (Supplementary information, Fig. S3b, 0/16 cells). While extensive CD45+ cells were present in the mesenchyme, the inflammatory cells did not seem to infiltrate into the epithelial layer (Supplementary information, Fig. S3c). We did not observe proliferating AT1 cells in the alveoli (Supplementary information, Fig. S4). 3.99% ± 1.66% of AT2 cells exhibited Ki67 staining in the parenchyma where the alveoli were relatively well preserved. However, in severely damaged area 15.69% ± 1.87% of AT2 cells were proliferative (Fig. 1d; Supplementary information, Fig. S4), suggesting that AT2 cells are mobilized to regenerate the alveoli. Taken together, we demonstrate that distinct cell populations proliferate in different regions of the respiratory system following SARS-CoV-2 infection (Fig. 1e). In the trachea and larger airways basal cells (KRT5+) proliferate extensively. This is consistent with a previous report showing that approximately 84% proliferating cells express KRT5 in the normal large airways (>2 mm). 12 Interestingly, although approximately 30% proliferating cells exhibit KRT5 expression in the small airways of COVID-19 lungs, the majority of proliferating cells do not express KRT5. Among them the predominant cell population does not express lineage markers including SCGB1A1, FOXJ1, acetylated tubulin, MUC5AC and SYP as evidenced by immunostaining. Whether these Lineage Negative Proliferating Cells (LNPCs) are similar to the LNEPs identified in mouse models 13 remains to be determined. It is also unknown whether these cells are derived from the underlying basal cells or neighboring club cells. The alveoli AT2 cells proliferate extensively in response to virus-induced damage. Mouse studies have shown that basal cells and AT2 cells consist of multiple subpopulations (reviewed by 6 ). It will be interesting to further determine which subpopulations are activated and participate in lung regeneration in COVID-19 patients. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that promote the expansion of distinct progenitors present in the proximal/distal airways and alveoli is critical for rebuilding a functional respirator system. Supplementary information Supplementary, Figures and Methods

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium.

          The pseudostratified epithelium of the mouse trachea and human airways contains a population of basal cells expressing Trp-63 (p63) and cytokeratins 5 (Krt5) and Krt14. Using a KRT5-CreER(T2) transgenic mouse line for lineage tracing, we show that basal cells generate differentiated cells during postnatal growth and in the adult during both steady state and epithelial repair. We have fractionated mouse basal cells by FACS and identified 627 genes preferentially expressed in a basal subpopulation vs. non-BCs. Analysis reveals potential mechanisms regulating basal cells and allows comparison with other epithelial stem cells. To study basal cell behaviors, we describe a simple in vitro clonal sphere-forming assay in which mouse basal cells self-renew and generate luminal cells, including differentiated ciliated cells, in the absence of stroma. The transcriptional profile identified 2 cell-surface markers, ITGA6 and NGFR, which can be used in combination to purify human lung basal cells by FACS. Like those from the mouse trachea, human airway basal cells both self-renew and generate luminal daughters in the sphere-forming assay.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Number and proliferation of basal and parabasal cells in normal human airway epithelium.

            Two roles have been suggested for basal cells on the basis of studies performed with laboratory animals: (1) anchoring of the tracheobronchial epithelium; and (2) being the epithelial stem cell. Parabasal cells located just above the basal cells have also been shown to contribute to cell renewal. However, a systematic study of the composition and proliferation of basal and parabasal cells in normal human lungs is lacking. The aims of this study were to determine in normal human conducting-airway epithelium: (1) the number of basal and parabasal cells; and (2) the contribution of basal and parabasal cells to the proliferation fraction. Samples of histologically normal tissue, free of pulmonary disease, were taken from seven lungs obtained by autopsy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with the primary antibody MIB-1 as a proliferation marker and the antikeratin antibody 34betaE12 as a marker for basal and parabasal cells. In the largest conducting airways (diameter >= 4 mm), the percentages of basal and parabasal cells were 31% and 7%, respectively; the contribution to the proliferation compartment was 51% for basal and 33% for parabasal cells. In the smallest airways (diameter < 0.5 mm), 6% of epithelial cells were basal cells, with a 30% contribution to the proliferation compartment, whereas parabasal cells were absent. The high fraction of basal and parabasal cells contributing to the proliferation compartment of normal human conducting-airway epithelium supports the theory that cells at or near the basement membrane are likely to be progenitor cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Airway basal cells. The "smoking gun" of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

              The earliest abnormality in the lung associated with smoking is hyperplasia of airway basal cells, the stem/progenitor cells of the ciliated and secretory cells that are central to pulmonary host defense. Using cell biology and 'omics technologies to assess basal cells isolated from bronchoscopic brushings of nonsmokers, smokers, and smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), compelling evidence has been provided in support of the concept that airway basal cells are central to the pathogenesis of smoking-associated lung diseases. When confronted by the chronic stress of smoking, airway basal cells become disorderly, regress to a more primitive state, behave as dictated by their inheritance, are susceptible to acquired changes in their genome, lose the capacity to regenerate the epithelium, are responsible for the major changes in the airway that characterize COPD, and, with persistent stress, can undergo malignant transformation. Together, these observations led to the conclusion that accelerated loss of lung function in susceptible individuals begins with disordered airway basal cell biology (i.e., that airway basal cells are the "smoking gun" of COPD, a potential target for the development of therapies to prevent smoking-related lung disorders).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jq2240@cumc.columbia.edu
                Journal
                Cell Res
                Cell Res
                Cell Research
                Springer Singapore (Singapore )
                1001-0602
                1748-7838
                30 June 2020
                : 1-3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2285 2675, GRID grid.239585.0, Center for Human Development and Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Department of Medicine, , Columbia University Medical Center, ; New York, 10032 NY USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0476 8324, GRID grid.417052.5, Department of Pathology, , Westchester Medical Center, ; Valhalla, 10595 NY USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2285 2675, GRID grid.239585.0, Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, , Columbia University Medical Center, ; New York, 10032 NY USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6540-6701
                Article
                367
                10.1038/s41422-020-0367-9
                7325636
                32606347
                6c432886-95a6-4177-8822-d9729534437a
                © Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, CAS 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 24 May 2020
                : 20 June 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Cell biology
                regeneration,stem-cell differentiation
                Cell biology
                regeneration, stem-cell differentiation

                Comments

                Comment on this article