6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A triage framework for managing novel, hybrid, and designed marine ecosystems

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The novel ecosystem (NE) concept has been discussed in terrestrial restoration ecology over the last 15 years but has not yet found much traction in the marine context. Against a background of unprecedented environmental change, managers of natural marine resources have portfolios full of altered systems for which restoration to a previous historical baseline may be impractical for ecological, social, or financial reasons. In these cases, the NE concept is useful for weighing options and emphasizes the risk of doing nothing by forcing questions regarding the value of novelty and how it can best be managed in the marine realm. Here, we explore how the concept fits marine ecosystems. We propose a scheme regarding how the NE concept could be used as a triage framework for use in marine environments within the context of a decision framework that explicitly considers changed ecosystems and whether restoration is the best or only option. We propose a conceptual diagram to show where marine NEs fit in the continuum of unaltered to shifted marine ecosystems. Overall, we suggest that the NE concept is of interest to marine ecologists and resource managers because it introduces a new vocabulary for considering marine systems that have been changed through human actions but have not shifted to an alternate stable state. Although it remains to be seen whether the concept of marine NEs leads to better conservation and restoration decisions, we posit that the concept may help inform management decisions in an era of unprecedented global marine change.

          Abstract

          The novel ecosystem (NE) concept has been discussed in terrestrial restoration ecology over the last 15 years but has not yet found much traction in the marine context. Here the NE concept is explored for marine ecosystems and a triage framework is proposed to specifically consider ecosystems that have been altered by human impacts but have not yet shifted to an alternative stable state.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is conservation triage just smart decision making?

            Conservation efforts and emergency medicine face comparable problems: how to use scarce resources wisely to conserve valuable assets. In both fields, the process of prioritising actions is known as triage. Although often used implicitly by conservation managers, scientists and policymakers, triage has been misinterpreted as the process of simply deciding which assets (e.g. species, habitats) will not receive investment. As a consequence, triage is sometimes associated with a defeatist conservation ethic. However, triage is no more than the efficient allocation of conservation resources and we risk wasting scarce resources if we do not follow its basic principles.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.

              Conservation funds are grossly inadequate to address the plight of threatened species. Government and conservation organizations faced with the task of conserving threatened species desperately need simple strategies for allocating limited resources. The academic literature dedicated to systematic priority setting usually recommends ranking species on several criteria, including level of endangerment and metrics of species value such as evolutionary distinctiveness, ecological importance, and social significance. These approaches ignore 2 crucial factors: the cost of management and the likelihood that the management will succeed. These oversights will result in misallocation of scarce conservation resources and possibly unnecessary losses. We devised a project prioritization protocol (PPP) to optimize resource allocation among New Zealand's threatened-species projects, where costs, benefits (including species values), and the likelihood of management success were considered simultaneously. We compared the number of species managed and the expected benefits gained with 5 prioritization criteria: PPP with weightings based on species value; PPP with species weighted equally; management costs; species value; and threat status. We found that the rational use of cost and success information substantially increased the number of species managed, and prioritizing management projects according to species value or threat status in isolation was inefficient and resulted in fewer species managed. In addition, we found a clear trade-off between funding management of a greater number of the most cost-efficient and least risky projects and funding fewer projects to manage the species of higher value. Specifically, 11 of 32 species projects could be funded if projects were weighted by species value compared with 16 projects if projects were not weighted. This highlights the value of a transparent decision-making process, which enables a careful consideration of trade-offs. The use of PPP can substantially improve conservation outcomes for threatened species by increasing efficiency and ensuring transparency of management decisions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marie-lise.schlappy@uwa.edu.au
                Journal
                Glob Chang Biol
                Glob Chang Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486
                GCB
                Global Change Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                13 August 2019
                October 2019
                : 25
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1111/gcb.v25.10 )
                : 3215-3223
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences Oceans Graduate School The University of Western Australia Crawley WA Australia
                [ 2 ] Australian Institute of Marine Science IOMRC (M096) Crawley WA Australia
                [ 3 ] School of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley WA Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Marie‐Lise Schläppy, Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Oceans Graduate School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

                Email: marie-lise.schlappy@ 123456uwa.edu.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2131-8515
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-3147
                Article
                GCB14757
                10.1111/gcb.14757
                6852170
                31313869
                6beca289-0c79-44d0-b725-6bfcd7f55144
                © 2019 The Authors Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 October 2018
                : 06 June 2019
                : 19 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 9, Words: 7201
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Western Australia , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001801;
                Funded by: Australian Institute of Marine Science , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100008344;
                Categories
                Opinion
                Opinion
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:13.11.2019

                climate change,conservation,human values,marine ecosystem,marine phase shifts,novel ecosystem,restoration

                Comments

                Comment on this article