5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Measuring performances through multiplicative functions by modifying the MEREC method: MEREC-G and MEREC-H

      International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study aims to apply new modifications by changing the nonlinear logarithmic calculation steps in the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) method. Geometric and harmonic mean from multiplicative functions is used for the modifications made while extracting the effects of the criteria on the overall performance one by one. Instead of the nonlinear logarithmic measure used in the MEREC method, it is desired to obtain results that are closer to the mean and have a lower standard deviation.

          Design/methodology/approach

          The MEREC method is based on the removal effects of the criteria on the overall performance. The method uses a logarithmic measure with a nonlinear function. MEREC-G using geometric mean and MEREC-H using harmonic mean are introduced in this study. The authors compared the MEREC method, its modifications and some other objective weight determination methods.

          Findings

          MEREC-G and MEREC-H variants, which are modifications of the MEREC method, are shown to be effective in determining the objective weights of the criteria. Findings of the MEREC-G and MEREC-H variants are more convenient, simpler, more reasonable, closer to the mean and have fewer deviations. It was determined that the MEREC-G variant gave more compatible findings with the entropy method.

          Practical implications

          Decision-making can occur at any time in any area of life. There are various criteria and alternatives for decision-making. In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models, it is a very important distinction to determine the criteria weights for the selection/ranking of the alternatives. The MEREC method can be used to find more reasonable or average results than other weight determination methods such as entropy. It can be expected that the MEREC method will be more used in daily life problems and various areas.

          Originality/value

          Objective weight determination methods evaluate the weights of the criteria according to the scores of the determined alternatives. In this study, the MEREC method, which is an objective weight determination method, has been expanded. Although a nonlinear measurement model is used in the literature, the contribution was made in this study by using multiplicative functions. As an important originality, the authors demonstrated the effect of removing criteria in the MEREC method in a sensitivity analysis by actually removing the alternatives one by one from the model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
                IJIEOM
                Emerald
                2690-6090
                2690-6104
                February 20 2023
                February 20 2023
                Article
                10.1108/IJIEOM-12-2022-0068
                6beb8164-bfa1-4c0e-90b8-cb4c726a658d
                © 2023

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article