9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The diaphyseal aseptic tibial nonunions after failed previous treatment options managed with the reamed intramedullary locking nail

      , ,
      Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2965596e149"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2965596e150">Background</h5> <p id="d2965596e152">The nonunion of open and closed tibial shaft fractures continues to be a common complication of fractures. Tibial nonunions constitute the majority of long bone nonunions seen by orthopaedic surgeons. In this article, we present our approach to the surgical treatment of noninfected tibial shaft nonunions. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2965596e154"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2965596e155">Methods</h5> <p id="d2965596e157">Between 2008 and 2014, 33 patients with aseptic diaphyseal tibial nonunion was treated by reamed intramedullary nailing and were retrospectively reviewed. The initial fracture management consisted of external fixation (27 patients), plate fixation (2 patients) and cast treatment (4 patients). All patients, preoperatively, were evaluated for the signs of the infection, by the same protocol. There were 13 hypertrophic, 16 oligotrophic (atrophic) and 4 defect nonunions registered in our material. The primary goal was to perform a closed intramedullary nailing on antegrade manner. An open procedure was only unavoidable when implants had to be removed or an osteotomy had to be performed to improve the alignment. Functional rehabilitation was encouraged with the assistance of a physiotherapist early postoperative. Patients were examined regularly during followed-up for a minimum of 12 months period for clinical and radiological signs of union, infection, malunion, malalignment, limb shortening, and implant failure. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2965596e159"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2965596e160">Results</h5> <p id="d2965596e162">The time that elapsed from injury to intramedullary nailing ranged from 9 months to 48 months (mean 17 months).Open intramedullary nailing was unavoidable in 25 cases (75,75%), while closed nailing was performed in 8 patients (24,25%). Osteotomy or resection of the fibula was performed in 78,8% of the cases. All patients were followed up in average period of 2 years postoperative (range 1–4 years), and 31(93,9%) patients achieved a solid union within the first 8 months. Mean union time was 5±0.8 months. Complications included 2 (6,06%) patients, one with deep infection and another case with absence of bone healing. Anatomical alignment has been achieved in the majority of patients, 28 patients (84,8%). The additionally autogenous bone chips were added in 4 patients (12,1%) where cortical defect was greater than 50% of the bone circumference. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2965596e164"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2965596e165">Conclusion</h5> <p id="d2965596e167">In conclusion, a reamed intramedullary nail provides optimal conditions for stable fixation, good rotational control, adequate alignment, early weight-bearing and a high union rate of tibial non-unions. Reaming of the medullary canal with preservation of periosteal sleeve create the "breeding ground" for sound healing of tibial shaft nonunions. Additionally cancellous bone grafting is recommended only in the case of defect nonunion. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
          Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
          Elsevier BV
          09765662
          January 2019
          January 2019
          : 10
          : 1
          : 182-190
          Article
          10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.006
          6349606
          30705557
          6be633c1-c809-44a3-8fca-7d4d9b18c0a9
          © 2019

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article