3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nascent to novel methods to evaluate malnutrition and frailty in the surgical patient

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Preoperative nutrition status is an important determinant of surgical outcomes, yet malnutrition assessment is not integrated into all surgical pathways. Given its importance and the high prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing surgical procedures, preoperative nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention are needed to improve postoperative outcomes. This narrative review discusses novel methods to assess malnutrition and frailty in the surgical patient. The Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria are increasingly used in surgical settings although further spread and implementation are strongly encouraged to help standardize the diagnosis of malnutrition. The use of body composition (ie, reduced muscle mass) as a phenotypic criterion in GLIM may lead to a greater number of patients identified as having malnutrition, which may otherwise be undetected if screened by other diagnostic tools. Skeletal muscle loss is a defining criterion of malnutrition and frailty. Novel direct and indirect approaches to assess muscle mass in clinical settings may facilitate the identification of patients with or at risk for malnutrition. Selected imaging techniques have the additional advantage of identifying myosteatosis (an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality for surgical patients). Feasible pathways for screening and assessing frailty exist and may determine the cost/benefit of surgery, long‐term independence and productivity, and the value of undertaking targeted interventions. Finally, the evaluation of nutrition risk and status is essential to predict and mitigate surgical outcomes. Nascent to novel approaches are the future of objectively identifying patients at perioperative nutrition risk and guiding therapy toward optimal perioperative standards of care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references116

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community

          This initiative is focused on building a global consensus around core diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in adults in clinical settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018

            This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Sarcopenia: A Time for Action. An SCWD Position Paper

              Abstract The term sarcopenia was introduced in 1988. The original definition was a “muscle loss” of the appendicular muscle mass in the older people as measured by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). In 2010, the definition was altered to be low muscle mass together with low muscle function and this was agreed upon as reported in a number of consensus papers. The Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders supports the recommendations of more recent consensus conferences, i.e. that rapid screening, such as with the SARC‐F questionnaire, should be utilized with a formal diagnosis being made by measuring grip strength or chair stand together with DXA estimation of appendicular muscle mass (indexed for height2). Assessments of the utility of ultrasound and creatine dilution techniques are ongoing. Use of ultrasound may not be easily reproducible. Primary sarcopenia is aging associated (mediated) loss of muscle mass. Secondary sarcopenia (or disease‐related sarcopenia) has predominantly focused on loss of muscle mass without the emphasis on muscle function. Diseases that can cause muscle wasting (i.e. secondary sarcopenia) include malignant cancer, COPD, heart failure, and renal failure and others. Management of sarcopenia should consist of resistance exercise in combination with a protein intake of 1 to 1.5 g/kg/day. There is insufficient evidence that vitamin D and anabolic steroids are beneficial. These recommendations apply to both primary (age‐related) sarcopenia and secondary (disease related) sarcopenia. Secondary sarcopenia also needs appropriate treatment of the underlying disease. It is important that primary care health professionals become aware of and make the diagnosis of age‐related and disease‐related sarcopenia. It is important to address the risk factors for sarcopenia, particularly low physical activity and sedentary behavior in the general population, using a life‐long approach. There is a need for more clinical research into the appropriate measurement for muscle mass and the management of sarcopenia. Accordingly, this position statement provides recommendations on the management of sarcopenia and how to progress the knowledge and recognition of sarcopenia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                carla.prado@ualberta.ca
                cristina.gonzalez@ucepl.edu.br
                Journal
                JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
                JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
                10.1002/(ISSN)1941-2444
                JPEN
                JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0148-6071
                1941-2444
                05 December 2022
                February 2023
                : 47
                : Suppl 1 , COMPREHENSIVE NUTRITIONAL THERAPY ‐ TACTICAL APPROACHES IN 2022 ( doiID: 10.1002/jpen.v47.S1 )
                : S54-S68
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
                [ 2 ] Postgraduate Program in Health and Behavior Catholic University of Pelotas Pelotas Brazil
                [ 3 ] School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 4 ] Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 5 ] School of Human Nutrition McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
                [ 6 ] Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA
                [ 7 ] Department of Surgery Central Michigan University Saginaw Michigan USA
                [ 8 ] Gastrointestinal Surgery Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK
                [ 9 ] MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Carla M. Prado, PhD, RD, Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 8602 112th Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada.

                Email: carla.prado@ 123456ualberta.ca

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-5641
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-9360
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-8182
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0615-5922
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-7911
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8677-9534
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-5796
                Article
                JPEN2420
                10.1002/jpen.2420
                9905223
                36468288
                6bddad79-855a-45e9-a171-b341cddcbb82
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 20 May 2022
                : 09 April 2022
                : 07 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 0, Pages: 15, Words: 9751
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: NIH R01HD107103
                Categories
                Review‐symposium
                Surgical Nutrition
                Review‐symposium
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:17.04.2023

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                body composition,frailty,glim,imaging,malnutrition,muscle mass,nutritional assessment,nutritional risk,nutritional screening,perioperative nutrition,sarcopenia,surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article