28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Aspectos macro e micropolíticos na organização do trabalho no NASF: o que a produção científica revela? Translated title: Macro and micropolitical aspects in the organization of work at NASF: what does scientific production reveal?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo Este artigo objetiva analisar a influência dos aspectos macro e micropolíticos na organização e processo de trabalho do NASF. Trata-se de uma scoping review, realizada durante o mês de junho de 2020, nas bases de dados Lilacs e Medline. Identificou-se que questões referentes à infraestrutura, gestão do trabalho do NASF, formação para o SUS, relação entre as equipes e características dos profissionais do NASF influenciam a organização e o processo de trabalho do NASF, evidenciando-se a ocorrência de um maior número de desafios, em detrimento das potencialidades para esse processo. Destaca-se que atravessamentos marcados pela conjuntura atual podem refletir incisivamente no trabalho dessas equipes. Aponta-se a necessidade da implantação de estratégias no sentido de dirimir os obstáculos desvelados por este estudo, tais como a criação de espaços de educação permanente no cotidiano das equipes, o estabelecimento de ferramentas de cogestão, e o incentivo a iniciativas que fomentem a integração ensino-serviço-comunidade.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract This article aims to analyze the influence of macro and micropolitical aspects on the organization and work process of Nasf. This is a scoping review, conducted in June 2020, in the Lilacs and Medline databases. It was found that issues related to infrastructure, Nasf work management, training for SUS, relationship between teams and characteristics of Nasf professionals influence the organization and work process of Nasf, attesting the occurrence of a higher number challenges rather than the potential for this process. It is noteworthy that crossings marked by the current conjuncture can strongly reflect on the work of these teams. There is a need to implement strategies to address the obstacles unveiled by this study, such as the creation of permanent education spaces in the daily lives of teams, the establishment of co-management tools, and the encouragement of initiatives that foster integration teaching-service-community.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

          Background Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. Discussion We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Summary Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Política Nacional de Atenção Básica 2017: retrocessos e riscos para o Sistema Único de Saúde

            RESUMO O artigo discute os significados e as implicações das mudanças introduzidas pela Política Nacional de Atenção Básica 2017, que promovem a relativização da cobertura universal, a segmentação do acesso, a recomposição das equipes, a reorganização do processo de trabalho e a fragilização da coordenação nacional da política. Argumenta-se que sua revisão indica sérios riscos para as conquistas obtidas com o fortalecimento da Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil. Na conjuntura atual de fortalecimento da ideologia neoliberal, tais modificações reforçam a subtração de direitos e o processo de desconstrução do Sistema Único de Saúde em curso no País.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature review.

              Interprofessional collaboration improves patient care, especially for those patients with complex and/or chronic conditions. Many studies examining collaborative practice in primary care settings have been undertaken, yet identification of essential elements of effective interprofessional collaboration in primary care settings remains obscure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                physis
                Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva
                Physis
                IMS-UERJ (, RJ, Brazil )
                0103-7331
                1809-4481
                2020
                : 30
                : 4
                : e300405
                Affiliations
                [1] Londrina Paraná orgnameUniversidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil daifisiouel@ 123456yahoo.com.br
                [4] Londrina Paraná orgnameUniversidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil fernanda0683@ 123456gmail.com
                [3] Londrina Paraná orgnameUniversidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil marsellecarvalho@ 123456gmail.com
                [2] Londrina Paraná orgnameUniversidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil brigidagimenez@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0103-73312020000400602 S0103-7331(20)03000400602
                10.1590/s0103-73312020300405
                6bcc5be2-e9b7-4ef9-911c-639ee736a974

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 18 February 2020
                : 28 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 37, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Public Health

                Categories
                Temas Livres

                política de saúde,health policy,patient care team,public health practice,equipe multiprofissional,Atenção Primária à Saúde,prática de saúde pública,Primary Health Care

                Comments

                Comment on this article