0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reporting involvement activities with children and young people in paediatric research: a framework analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The active involvement of patients and the public in the design and delivery of health research has been increasingly encouraged, if not enforced. Knowledge of how this is realised in practice, especially where children and young people (CYP) are concerned, is limited, partly due to the low level of reporting of patient and public involvement (PPI) in general. The aim of this work was to assess how researchers funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) report the involvement of CYP in the design and conduct of child health research to better understand the opportunities offered to CYP, and the realities of involvement in practice.

          Methods

          A participation matrix, analysis framework and accompanying tools were adapted from existing frameworks, including a child-rights informed framework, the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public Checklist Short Form (GRIPP2SF), and NIHR reporting expectations. Child-focused research reports were identified from the NIHR Journals Library, including any interventional or observational study involving CYP aged 0–< 24 years. In two co-design workshops with healthcare professionals and CYP, we tested and refined the participation matrix, analysis framework and accompanying tools.

          Results

          Only thirty-two NIHR reports out of 169 (19%) were identified as relevant and included reporting of PPI with CYP. We identified significant variability in the way PPI with CYP was reported. Only 4/32 (12%) reports fully met NIHR (and GRIPP2SF) reporting criteria. Only 3/32 (9%) reports formally evaluated or self-reflected on PPI activities with CYP, whilst 15/32 (47%) provided minimal information about CYP involvement. The most common approach to involving CYP (23/32, 72%) was through the medium of existing groups or networks.

          Conclusion

          Despite the NIHR’s commitment to increase the quality, transparency, and consistency of reporting PPI, the reporting of involvement with CYP remains sub-optimal. Neglecting to report key details of involvement methods and impacts deprives the research community of knowledge to advance the field of delivering ‘meaningful’ PPI with CYP. Practical guidance on how researchers can report the processes and outputs of CYP involvement more rigorously may help child health researchers to involve them more meaningfully. This research offers practical tools informed by CYP to aid the reporting process.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-023-00477-8.

          Abstract

          Background

          Children and young people can (and should) be involved in the design of child-health research. How this works in practice is limited due to the low-level reporting of involvement activities.

          Aim

          We wanted to understand how researchers funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) are reporting involvement activities with children and young people in child-health research.

          What we did and how we did it:

          A team of healthcare researchers (working in child-health research), a parent, and children and young people adapted existing tools to assess how the involvement of children and young people is reported in child-health research. We looked at reports in an online library to see how researchers are meeting the reporting guidelines set by the NIHR.

          Findings

          Despite the reporting guidelines provided by the NIHR, only four out of thirty-two reports followed this. It is still unclear who is involved, why, and what outcomes and impact involvement has on the research process, on children and young people and/or on researchers. This is a missed opportunity to learn from previous experiences and to build on good practice. Further work is needed to understand why and how the NIHR, and other funders of health research collect such information, and what their plans are for sharing the findings with the wider research community.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-023-00477-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

          Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines

              David Moher and colleagues from the EQUATOR network offer guidance and recommended steps for developing health research reporting guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jennifer.preston@liverpool.ac.uk
                Journal
                Res Involv Engagem
                Res Involv Engagem
                Research Involvement and Engagement
                BioMed Central (London )
                2056-7529
                31 July 2023
                31 July 2023
                2023
                : 9
                : 61
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.10025.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, , University of Liverpool, ; Liverpool, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.5337.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7603, Bristol Medical School, , University of Bristol, ; Bristol, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.1006.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, Population Health Sciences Institute, , University of Newcastle, ; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.459561.a, ISNI 0000 0004 4904 7256, Rehabilitation Department, , Great North Children’s Hospital, ; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Institute of Child Health, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.10025.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, School of Social Justice and Law, , University of Liverpool, ; Liverpool, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.417858.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0421 1374, Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, , Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, ; Liverpool, UK
                Article
                477
                10.1186/s40900-023-00477-8
                10388467
                37525218
                6bba2cc7-d1c8-41fb-babf-3643549de349
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 8 March 2023
                : 24 July 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Hugh Greenwood Legacy for Children's Health Research Fund: Hugh Greenwood Legacy Fellowship
                Categories
                Methodology
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content39

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors828