53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Discriminating Crop, Weeds and Soil Surface with a Terrestrial LIDAR Sensor

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, the evaluation of the accuracy and performance of a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) sensor for vegetation using distance and reflection measurements aiming to detect and discriminate maize plants and weeds from soil surface was done. The study continues a previous work carried out in a maize field in Spain with a LIDAR sensor using exclusively one index, the height profile. The current system uses a combination of the two mentioned indexes. The experiment was carried out in a maize field at growth stage 12–14, at 16 different locations selected to represent the widest possible density of three weeds: Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauv., Lamium purpureum L., Galium aparine L.and Veronica persica Poir.. A terrestrial LIDAR sensor was mounted on a tripod pointing to the inter-row area, with its horizontal axis and the field of view pointing vertically downwards to the ground, scanning a vertical plane with the potential presence of vegetation. Immediately after the LIDAR data acquisition (distances and reflection measurements), actual heights of plants were estimated using an appropriate methodology. For that purpose, digital images were taken of each sampled area. Data showed a high correlation between LIDAR measured height and actual plant heights (R 2 = 0.75). Binary logistic regression between weed presence/absence and the sensor readings (LIDAR height and reflection values) was used to validate the accuracy of the sensor. This permitted the discrimination of vegetation from the ground with an accuracy of up to 95%. In addition, a Canonical Discrimination Analysis (CDA) was able to discriminate mostly between soil and vegetation and, to a far lesser extent, between crop and weeds. The studied methodology arises as a good system for weed detection, which in combination with other principles, such as vision-based technologies, could improve the efficiency and accuracy of herbicide spraying.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Ultrasonic and LIDAR Sensors for Electronic Canopy Characterization in Vineyards: Advances to Improve Pesticide Application Methods

          Canopy characterization is a key factor to improve pesticide application methods in tree crops and vineyards. Development of quick, easy and efficient methods to determine the fundamental parameters used to characterize canopy structure is thus an important need. In this research the use of ultrasonic and LIDAR sensors have been compared with the traditional manual and destructive canopy measurement procedure. For both methods the values of key parameters such as crop height, crop width, crop volume or leaf area have been compared. Obtained results indicate that an ultrasonic sensor is an appropriate tool to determine the average canopy characteristics, while a LIDAR sensor provides more accuracy and detailed information about the canopy. Good correlations have been obtained between crop volume (CVU ) values measured with ultrasonic sensors and leaf area index, LAI (R2 = 0.51). A good correlation has also been obtained between the canopy volume measured with ultrasonic and LIDAR sensors (R2 = 0.52). Laser measurements of crop height (CHL ) allow one to accurately predict the canopy volume. The proposed new technologies seems very appropriate as complementary tools to improve the efficiency of pesticide applications, although further improvements are still needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Precision farming for weed management: techniques

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Weed discrimination using ultrasonic sensors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
                1424-8220
                November 2013
                29 October 2013
                : 13
                : 11
                : 14662-14675
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Weed Science (360b), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany; E-Mails: Andujar@ 123456uni-hohenheim.de (D.A.); roland.gerhards@ 123456uni-hohenheim.de (R.G.)
                [2 ] Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Section Instrumentation & Test Engineering (440c), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany; E-Mails: hugo.moreno.parrizas@ 123456gmail.com (H.M.); hw.griepentrog@ 123456uni-hohenheim.de (H.-W.G.)
                [3 ] Department of Agricultural and Forest Engineering, Research Group on AgroICT & Precision Agriculture, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida 25198, Spain; E-Mails: jr.rosell@ 123456eagrof.udl.cat (J.R.R.-P.); aescola@ 123456eagrof.udl.cat (A.E.)
                [4 ] Politechnic University of Madrid, E.T.S.I. Agrónomos, Madrid 28040, Spain; E-Mail: constantino.valero@ 123456upm.es
                [5 ] Institute of Agricultural Sciences, CSIC, Madrid 28006, Spain; E-Mails: cesar@ 123456ica.csic.es (C.F.-Q.); jose.dorado@ 123456ica.csic.es (J.D.)
                Author notes
                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: patovicnsf@ 123456gmail.com ; Tel.: +49-711-459-24057; Fax: +49-711-459-22408
                Article
                sensors-13-14662
                10.3390/s131114662
                3871132
                24172283
                6ba23f40-d86c-4ff7-9129-f26910e0d79d
                © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 08 October 2013
                : 22 October 2013
                : 25 October 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                site-specific weed control,chemical control,weed proximal-sensing
                Biomedical engineering
                site-specific weed control, chemical control, weed proximal-sensing

                Comments

                Comment on this article