16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Waste Reduction Strategies: Factors Affecting Talent Wastage and the Efficacy of Talent Selection in Sport

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coaches are faced with the difficult task of identifying and selecting athletes to their team. Despite its widespread practice in sport, there is still much to learn about improving the identification and selection process. Evidence to date suggests selection decisions (at different competitive levels) can be inaccurate, bias driven, and sometimes even illogical. These mistakes are believed to contribute to “talent wastage,” the effect of a coach’s wrongful selection and/or deselection of an athlete to/from a team. Errors of this scale can lead to negative repercussions for all stakeholders involved and therefore deserve further exploration. It is the purpose of this paper to shed light on the potential factors influencing talent wastage and to illuminate possible psychological pitfalls when making decisions under uncertainty.

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

            J Swets (1988)
            Diagnostic systems of several kinds are used to distinguish between two classes of events, essentially "signals" and "noise". For them, analysis in terms of the "relative operating characteristic" of signal detection theory provides a precise and valid measure of diagnostic accuracy. It is the only measure available that is uninfluenced by decision biases and prior probabilities, and it places the performances of diverse systems on a common, easily interpreted scale. Representative values of this measure are reported here for systems in medical imaging, materials testing, weather forecasting, information retrieval, polygraph lie detection, and aptitude testing. Though the measure itself is sound, the values obtained from tests of diagnostic systems often require qualification because the test data on which they are based are of unsure quality. A common set of problems in testing is faced in all fields. How well these problems are handled, or can be handled in a given field, determines the degree of confidence that can be placed in a measured value of accuracy. Some fields fare much better than others.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On the psychology of prediction.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                10 January 2020
                2019
                : 10
                : 2925
                Affiliations
                School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University , Toronto, ON, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Adelaida María Castro Sánchez, University of Almería, Spain

                Reviewed by: Andreas Ivarsson, Halmstad University, Sweden; Ruud J. R. Den Hartigh, University of Groningen, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Kathryn Johnston, Krobinso@ 123456yorku.ca

                This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02925
                6967295
                31998188
                6b971431-f4c7-4610-8895-03a07d631057
                Copyright © 2020 Johnston and Baker.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 August 2019
                : 11 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 137, Pages: 11, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                talent,talent selection,talent wastage,selection bias,cognitive bias,decision-making

                Comments

                Comment on this article