0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Treatment effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in Veterans with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. bacteremia

      research-article
      , MPH 1 , , , MD, MS 2 , 3 , , PharmD, MS, FCCP 4 , 5 , , PhD, MPH 1 , 6 , , MD, MS 7 , 8 , , MD 9 , 10 , , PhD, MPH 1 , 6
      Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology : ASHE
      Cambridge University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To describe antimicrobial therapy used for multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter spp. bacteremia in Veterans and impacts on mortality.

          Methods:

          This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients from 2012 to 2018 with a positive MDR Acinetobacter spp. blood culture who received antimicrobial treatment 2 days prior to through 5 days after the culture date. Only the first culture per patient was used. The association between treatment and patient characteristics was assessed using bivariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the relationship between antibiotic regimen and in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Generalized linear models were used to assess cost outcomes.

          Results:

          MDR Acinetobacter spp. was identified in 184 patients. Most cultures identified were Acinetobacter baumannii (90%), 3% were Acinetobacter lwoffii, and 7% were other Acinetobacter species. Penicillins—β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (51.1%) and carbapenems (51.6%)—were the most prescribed antibiotics. In unadjusted analysis, extended spectrum cephalosporins and penicillins—β-lactamase inhibitor combinations—were associated with a decreased odds of 30-day mortality but were insignificant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.21–1.05, aOR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.37–1.53). There was no association between combination therapy vs monotherapy and 30-day mortality (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI, 0.72–3.32).

          Conclusion:

          In hospitalized Veterans with MDR Acinetobacter spp., none of the treatments were shown to be associated with in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Combination therapy was not associated with decreased mortality for MDR Acinetobacter spp. bacteremia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

          The objective of this study was to develop a prospectively applicable method for classifying comorbid conditions which might alter the risk of mortality for use in longitudinal studies. A weighted index that takes into account the number and the seriousness of comorbid disease was developed in a cohort of 559 medical patients. The 1-yr mortality rates for the different scores were: "0", 12% (181); "1-2", 26% (225); "3-4", 52% (71); and "greater than or equal to 5", 85% (82). The index was tested for its ability to predict risk of death from comorbid disease in the second cohort of 685 patients during a 10-yr follow-up. The percent of patients who died of comorbid disease for the different scores were: "0", 8% (588); "1", 25% (54); "2", 48% (25); "greater than or equal to 3", 59% (18). With each increased level of the comorbidity index, there were stepwise increases in the cumulative mortality attributable to comorbid disease (log rank chi 2 = 165; p less than 0.0001). In this longer follow-up, age was also a predictor of mortality (p less than 0.001). The new index performed similarly to a previous system devised by Kaplan and Feinstein. The method of classifying comorbidity provides a simple, readily applicable and valid method of estimating risk of death from comorbid disease for use in longitudinal studies. Further work in larger populations is still required to refine the approach because the number of patients with any given condition in this study was relatively small.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance.

            Many different definitions for multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) bacteria are being used in the medical literature to characterize the different patterns of resistance found in healthcare-associated, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. A group of international experts came together through a joint initiative by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to create a standardized international terminology with which to describe acquired resistance profiles in Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae (other than Salmonella and Shigella), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., all bacteria often responsible for healthcare-associated infections and prone to multidrug resistance. Epidemiologically significant antimicrobial categories were constructed for each bacterium. Lists of antimicrobial categories proposed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing were created using documents and breakpoints from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MDR was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories, XDR was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories (i.e. bacterial isolates remain susceptible to only one or two categories) and PDR was defined as non-susceptibility to all agents in all antimicrobial categories. To ensure correct application of these definitions, bacterial isolates should be tested against all or nearly all of the antimicrobial agents within the antimicrobial categories and selective reporting and suppression of results should be avoided. © 2011 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. No claim to original US government works.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol
                Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol
                ASH
                Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology : ASHE
                Cambridge University Press (New York, USA )
                2732-494X
                2023
                12 December 2023
                : 3
                : 1
                : e230
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center , Hines, IL, USA
                [ 2 ] Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Drive Care, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center , Aurora, CO, USA
                [ 3 ] University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
                [ 4 ] Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System , Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [ 5 ]Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [ 6 ] Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , Chicago, IL, USA
                [ 7 ] Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                [ 8 ] Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                [ 9 ]VHA MRSA/MDRO Program Office, the National Infectious Diseases Service, Patient Care Services, VA Central Office and the Lexington VA Medical Center , Lexington, KY, USA
                [ 10 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky School of Medicine , Lexington, KY, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Amanda Vivo; Email: Amanda.vivo@ 123456va.gov
                [a]

                Former affiliations: Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, Hines, IL, USA; Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-527X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-9238
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-7689
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6725-875X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0696-8288
                Article
                S2732494X23005004
                10.1017/ash.2023.500
                10753468
                38156232
                6b914e66-ccc0-43ca-8a6c-f6cbbe7af52b
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 September 2023
                : 24 October 2023
                : 27 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, References: 25, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article