4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anode Catalysts in CO 2 Electrolysis: Challenges and Untapped Opportunities

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The field of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction has developed rapidly during recent years. At the same time, the role of the anodic half-reaction has received considerably less attention. In this Perspective, we scrutinize the reports on the best-performing CO 2 electrolyzer cells from the past 5 years, to shed light on the role of the anodic oxygen evolution catalyst. We analyze how different cell architectures provide different local chemical environments at the anode surface, which in turn determines the pool of applicable anode catalysts. We uncover the factors that led to either a strikingly high current density operation or an exceptionally long lifetime. On the basis of our analysis, we provide a set of criteria that have to be fulfilled by an anode catalyst to achieve high performance. Finally, we provide an outlook on using alternative anode reactions (alcohol oxidation is discussed as an example), resulting in high-value products and higher energy efficiency for the overall process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references171

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Progress and Perspectives of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Copper in Aqueous Electrolyte

          To date, copper is the only heterogeneous catalyst that has shown a propensity to produce valuable hydrocarbons and alcohols, such as ethylene and ethanol, from electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2R). There are variety of factors that impact CO2R activity and selectivity, including the catalyst surface structure, morphology, composition, the choice of electrolyte ions and pH, and the electrochemical cell design. Many of these factors are often intertwined, which can complicate catalyst discovery and design efforts. Here we take a broad and historical view of these different aspects and their complex interplay in CO2R catalysis on Cu, with the purpose of providing new insights, critical evaluations, and guidance to the field with regard to research directions and best practices. First, we describe the various experimental probes and complementary theoretical methods that have been used to discern the mechanisms by which products are formed, and next we present our current understanding of the complex reaction networks for CO2R on Cu. We then analyze two key methods that have been used in attempts to alter the activity and selectivity of Cu: nanostructuring and the formation of bimetallic electrodes. Finally, we offer some perspectives on the future outlook for electrochemical CO2R.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            CO2electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices.

              Objective comparisons of electrocatalyst activity and stability using standard methods under identical conditions are necessary to evaluate the viability of existing electrocatalysts for integration into solar-fuel devices as well as to help inform the development of new catalytic systems. Herein, we use a standard protocol as a primary screen for evaluating the activity, short-term (2 h) stability, and electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of 18 electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and 26 electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) under conditions relevant to an integrated solar water-splitting device in aqueous acidic or alkaline solution. Our primary figure of merit is the overpotential necessary to achieve a magnitude current density of 10 mA cm(-2) per geometric area, the approximate current density expected for a 10% efficient solar-to-fuels conversion device under 1 sun illumination. The specific activity per ECSA of each material is also reported. Among HER catalysts, several could operate at 10 mA cm(-2) with overpotentials <0.1 V in acidic and/or alkaline solutions. Among OER catalysts in acidic solution, no non-noble metal based materials showed promising activity and stability, whereas in alkaline solution many OER catalysts performed with similar activity achieving 10 mA cm(-2) current densities at overpotentials of ~0.33-0.5 V. Most OER catalysts showed comparable or better specific activity per ECSA when compared to Ir and Ru catalysts in alkaline solutions, while most HER catalysts showed much lower specific activity than Pt in both acidic and alkaline solutions. For select catalysts, additional secondary screening measurements were conducted including Faradaic efficiency and extended stability measurements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACS Catal
                ACS Catal
                cs
                accacs
                ACS Catalysis
                American Chemical Society
                2155-5435
                04 January 2022
                21 January 2022
                : 12
                : 2
                : 1037-1051
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre, University of Szeged , Aradi Square 1, Szeged H-6720, Hungary
                Author notes
                [* ]C.J.: email, janaky@ 123456chem.u-szeged.hu ; Twitter, @JanakyLab.
                Article
                10.1021/acscatal.1c04978
                8787754
                35096466
                6b6b0322-1e0f-4598-aa18-8c44f407dd39
                © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

                Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 October 2021
                : 11 December 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council, doi 10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: 716539
                Funded by: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, doi 10.13039/501100003825;
                Award ID: NA
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council, doi 10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: 862453
                Categories
                Perspective
                Custom metadata
                cs1c04978
                cs1c04978

                co2 electrolysis,ccu,oxygen evolution reaction,electrocatalysis,ph effects

                Comments

                Comment on this article