2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Complementary Effects of Adaptation and Gain Control on Sound Encoding in Primary Auditory Cortex

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An important step toward understanding how the brain represents complex natural sounds is to develop accurate models of auditory coding by single neurons. A commonly used model is the linear-nonlinear spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF; LN model). The LN model accounts for many features of auditory tuning, but it cannot account for long-lasting effects of sensory context on sound-evoked activity. Two mechanisms that may support these contextual effects are short-term plasticity (STP) and contrast-dependent gain control (GC), which have inspired expanded versions of the LN model. Both models improve performance over the LN model, but they have never been compared directly. Thus, it is unclear whether they account for distinct processes or describe one phenomenon in different ways. To address this question, we recorded activity of neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) of awake ferrets during presentation of natural sounds. We then fit models incorporating one nonlinear mechanism (GC or STP) or both (GC+STP) using this single dataset, and measured the correlation between the models’ predictions and the recorded neural activity. Both the STP and GC models performed significantly better than the LN model, but the GC+STP model outperformed both individual models. We also quantified the equivalence of STP and GC model predictions and found only modest similarity. Consistent results were observed for a dataset collected in clean and noisy acoustic contexts. These results establish general methods for evaluating the equivalence of arbitrarily complex encoding models and suggest that the STP and GC models describe complementary processes in the auditory system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python

          SciPy is an open-source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. Since its initial release in 2001, SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy 1.0 and highlight some recent technical developments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neural networks with dynamic synapses.

            Transmission across neocortical synapses depends on the frequency of presynaptic activity (Thomson & Deuchars, 1994). Interpyramidal synapses in layer V exhibit fast depression of synaptic transmission, while other types of synapses exhibit facilitation of transmission. To study the role of dynamic synapses in network computation, we propose a unified phenomenological model that allows computation of the postsynaptic current generated by both types of synapses when driven by an arbitrary pattern of action potential (AP) activity in a presynaptic population. Using this formalism, we analyze different regimes of synaptic transmission and demonstrate that dynamic synapses transmit different aspects of the presynaptic activity depending on the average presynaptic frequency. The model also allows for derivation of mean-field equations, which govern the activity of large, interconnected networks. We show that the dynamics of synaptic transmission results in complex sets of regular and irregular regimes of network activity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gain control by layer six in cortical circuits of vision.

              After entering the cerebral cortex, sensory information spreads through six different horizontal neuronal layers that are interconnected by vertical axonal projections. It is believed that through these projections layers can influence each other's response to sensory stimuli, but the specific role that each layer has in cortical processing is still poorly understood. Here we show that layer six in the primary visual cortex of the mouse has a crucial role in controlling the gain of visually evoked activity in neurons of the upper layers without changing their tuning to orientation. This gain modulation results from the coordinated action of layer six intracortical projections to superficial layers and deep projections to the thalamus, with a substantial role of the intracortical circuit. This study establishes layer six as a major mediator of cortical gain modulation and suggests that it could be a node through which convergent inputs from several brain areas can regulate the earliest steps of cortical visual processing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                27 October 2020
                12 November 2020
                Nov-Dec 2020
                : 7
                : 6
                : ENEURO.0205-20.2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Mathematics, Washington State University , Vancouver, WA, 98686
                [2 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: J.R.P. and S.V.D. designed research; J.R.P. performed research; J.R.P. and S.V.D. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; J.R.P. analyzed data; J.R.P. and S.V.D. wrote the paper.

                This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 EB 028155 and R01 DC 014950 and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Grant D15 AP 00101.

                Correspondence should be addressed to Stephen V. David at davids@ 123456ohsu.edu .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-3104
                Article
                eN-NWR-0205-20
                10.1523/ENEURO.0205-20.2020
                7675144
                33109632
                6b2381af-dccb-4231-b613-5c93d668638f
                Copyright © 2020 Pennington and David

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 12 May 2020
                : 15 August 2020
                : 5 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 1, Equations: 86, References: 51, Pages: 17, Words: 00
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000002HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
                Award ID: R01 EB 028155
                Award ID: R01 DC 014950
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000185DOD | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
                Award ID: D15 AP 00101
                Categories
                8
                Research Article: New Research
                Sensory and Motor Systems
                Custom metadata
                November/December 2020

                auditory encoding,computational modeling,gain control,sensory context,synaptic adaptation

                Comments

                Comment on this article