6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      D-dimer during pregnancy: establishing trimester-specific reference intervals

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). D-dimer is a biomarker used as an exclusion criterion of VTE disease, but its usefulness during pregnancy shows limitations because D-dimer levels physiologically increase through pregnancy. The aim of our study was to follow the changes of D-dimer levels and to establish trimester-specific reference intervals during normal pregnancy. This is a longitudinal prospective study in which the reference population finally included 102 healthy pregnant women. Plasma D-dimer levels were measured during the three trimesters of pregnancy, using a latex-based immunoturbidimetric assay. Reference intervals were calculated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations. D-dimer levels increased progressively and significantly through pregnancy and peaked in the third trimester, in which D-dimer levels were above the conventional cut-off point (500 µg/L) in 99% of pregnant women. The following reference intervals were defined: first trimester: 169-1202 µg/L, second trimester: 393-3258 µg/L and third trimester: 551-3333 µg/L. The study provides reference intervals of D-dimer during the pregnancy using latex-based immunoturbidimetry on the ACL 300 TOP automated coagulation analyser. Further prospective studies of pregnant women with clinical suspicion of VTE are needed to validate these results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Haemostatic reference intervals in pregnancy.

          Haemostatic reference intervals are generally based on samples from non-pregnant women. Thus, they may not be relevant to pregnant women, a problem that may hinder accurate diagnosis and treatment of haemostatic disorders during pregnancy. In this study, we establish gestational age-specific reference intervals for coagulation tests during normal pregnancy. Eight hundred one women with expected normal pregnancies were included in the study. Of these women, 391 had no complications during pregnancy, vaginal delivery, or postpartum period. Plasma samples were obtained at gestational weeks 13-20, 21-28, 29-34, 35-42, at active labor, and on postpartum days 1 and 2. Reference intervals for each gestational period using only the uncomplicated pregnancies were calculated in all 391 women for activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, fibrin D-dimer, antithrombin, free protein S, and protein C and in a subgroup of 186 women in addition for prothrombin time (PT), Owren and Quick PT, protein S activity, and total protein S and coagulation factors II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, and XII. The level of coagulation factors II, V, X, XI, XII and antithrombin, protein C, aPTT, PT remained largely unchanged during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum and were within non-pregnant reference intervals. However, levels of fibrinogen, D-dimer, and coagulation factors VII, VIII, and IX increased markedly. Protein S activity decreased substantially, while free protein S decreased slightly and total protein S was stable. Gestational age-specific reference values are essential for the accurate interpretation of a subset of haemostatic tests during pregnancy, delivery, and puerperium.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            D-dimer concentrations in normal pregnancy: new diagnostic thresholds are needed.

            Pregnancy is known to increase the D-dimer concentration above the conventional normal threshold of 0.50 mg/L, leading to an increased false-positive D-dimer test when venous thromboembolism (VTE) is clinically suspected in a pregnant patient. Our aim was to determine the effect of normal pregnancy on the D-dimer concentration. Healthy women who were seeking to become pregnant and had no preexisting condition known to increase the D-dimer concentration were identified. Quantitative D-dimer measurements (MDA turbidimetric assay) and fibrinogen assays were performed before conception, at each trimester, and at 4 weeks postpartum. Patients were excluded for fetal loss or preeclampsia. A total of 50 women were enrolled in the study, and blood samples were obtained at preconception and all trimesters from 23 women. The mean (SD) preconception D-dimer concentration was 0.43 (0.49) mg/L, and 79% of women had a D-dimer concentration <0.50 mg/L. D-Dimer increased with each trimester such that only 22% of women in the second trimester and none (of 23) in the third trimester (95% confidence interval, 0-14%) had a D-dimer concentration <0.50 mg/L. We found no correlation between either the D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations or between the increases in D-dimer and fibrinogen with pregnancy. Normal pregnancy causes a progressive increase in circulating D-dimer. The D-dimer test has no use in ruling out VTE in the third trimester if a cutoff of 0.50 mg/L is used. A large management study is needed to establish new thresholds for the D-dimer to rule out VTE in each trimester.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The use of D-dimer with new cutoff can be useful in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.

              D-dimer testing has an important role in the exclusion of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the nonpregnant population. Establishing D-dimers role in the diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy is hampered because of the substantial increase of D-dimer throughout gestational age. In a prospective study we followed 89 healthy pregnant women to establish the reference range of D-dimer for each trimester. D-dimer testing was also performed in 12 women with clinical suspicion of VTE and their results were compared with the established new reference range of D-dimer, and with the recorded ultrasound findings. In the first trimester, 84% women from reference group had normal D-dimer, in the second 33%, and by the third trimester only 1%, which suggests that D-dimer has no practical diagnostic use in ruling out VTE if the threshold of 230 ng/mL for abnormal is used. All pregnant women with thrombosis who had positive ultrasound findings also had statistically significant elevation of the D-dimer level, considering the established reference range of the corresponding trimester. We found 100% sensitivity of D-dimer test. A women developed thrombosis in the first trimester had 6.7-7.6 time higher level of D-dimer than the mean value in the reference group, and in the third trimester thrombotic women had 2.0-3.8 time higher level of D-dimer, p<0.0001. D-dimer test with the new threshold for: the first of 286, the second of 457 and the third trimester of 644 ng/mL can be useful in diagnosis of pregnancy related VTE.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
                Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
                Informa UK Limited
                0036-5513
                1502-7686
                September 27 2018
                August 18 2018
                July 05 2018
                August 18 2018
                : 78
                : 6
                : 439-442
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Biochemistry Department, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain;
                [2 ] Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
                Article
                10.1080/00365513.2018.1488177
                29975107
                6adab4ad-f9bc-43ed-8679-c273d077e643
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article