5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mutual mate guarding with limited sexual conflict in a sex-role-reversed shorebird

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mate guarding is typically considered a male strategy to protect paternity. However, under some circumstances, females might also benefit from guarding their mate. Female mate guarding might be particularly important in socially polyandrous species in which females compete for access to care-giving males. Because males also benefit from being near their partner to avoid paternity loss, pair members may have a mutual interest in mate guarding in polyandrous species. We studied the time spent together and movements that lead to separation, as behavioral measures of mate guarding, in the classically polyandrous red phalarope ( Phalaropus fulicarius). We equipped 64 breeding pairs with miniaturized telemetry loggers with GPS to assess variation in mate-guarding intensity in relation to breeding phenology and season, nest attendance, and the occurrence of extrapair paternity. We show that red phalarope pairs were almost continuously together in the days before clutch initiation with no sex bias in separation movements, indicating mutual contribution to mate guarding. Our results suggest that in red phalaropes, both pair members guard their mate, with limited sexual conflict arising through biases in the operational sex ratio and a trade-off with male nest attendance. We found no clear relationship between mate-guarding intensity and the occurrence of extrapair paternity. In this non-territorial socially polyandrous species, mutual mate guarding might be the process underlying the evolution of a brief but strong social pair bond, with no other purpose than producing a clutch for a care-giving male.

          Abstract

          In a few species, referred to as “sex-role reversed,” females compete for males who provide most or all parental care. Using continuous individual tracking data of red phalaropes, we show that these shorebird pairs spent most of their time in close proximity until egg laying. Males may benefit from “mate guarding” to avoid paternity loss, while females benefit from avoiding mate takeover, which may have led to the evolution of a brief but strong social pair bond.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling

          Count data can be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models when observations are correlated in ways that require random effects. However, count data are often zero-inflated, containing more zeros than would be expected from the typical error distributions. We present a new package, glmmTMB, and compare it to other R packages that fit zero-inflated mixed models. The glmmTMB package fits many types of GLMMs and extensions, including models with continuously distributed responses, but here we focus on count responses. glmmTMB is faster than glmmADMB, MCMCglmm, and brms, and more flexible than INLA and mgcv for zero-inflated modeling. One unique feature of glmmTMB (among packages that fit zero-inflated mixed models) is its ability to estimate the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution parameterized by the mean. Overall, its most appealing features for new users may be the combination of speed, flexibility, and its interface’s similarity to lme4. The R journal, 9 (2) ISSN:2073-4859
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            R: A Language and Environment of Statistical Computing

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds.

              Estimates of the incidence of major classes of parental care by birds are drawn from classical studies that preceded both the publication of a massive secondary literature and the revolution driven by molecular approaches to avian phylogeny. Here, I review this literature in the light of new phylogenetic hypotheses and estimate the prevalence of six distinct modes of care: use of geothermal heat to incubate eggs, brood parasitism, male only care, female only care, biparental care and cooperative breeding. Female only care and cooperative breeding are more common than has previously been recognized, occurring in 8 and 9% of species, respectively. Biparental care by a pair-bonded male and female is the most common pattern of care but at 81% of species, the pattern is less common than once believed. I identify several problems with existing hypotheses for the evolution of parental care and highlight a number of poorly understood contrasts which, once resolved, should help elucidate avian social evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Handling Editor
                Journal
                Behav Ecol
                Behav Ecol
                beheco
                Behavioral Ecology
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                1045-2249
                1465-7279
                Jan-Feb 2024
                01 December 2023
                01 December 2023
                : 35
                : 1
                : arad084
                Affiliations
                Department of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence , Eberhard Gwinner Str., 82319 Seewiesen, Germany
                Department of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence , Eberhard Gwinner Str., 82319 Seewiesen, Germany
                Department of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence , Eberhard Gwinner Str., 82319 Seewiesen, Germany
                Department of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence , Eberhard Gwinner Str., 82319 Seewiesen, Germany
                Department of Ornithology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence , Eberhard Gwinner Str., 82319 Seewiesen, Germany
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to B. Kempenaers. E-Mail: b.kempenaers@ 123456orn.mpg.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8080-1734
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6907-7802
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5984-8925
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-5458
                Article
                arad084
                10.1093/beheco/arad084
                10773304
                38193015
                6ab8bf40-4a48-48ed-a63b-c163403baf85
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 April 2023
                : 22 August 2023
                : 12 September 2023
                : 18 September 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                Funded by: Max Planck Society, DOI 10.13039/501100004189;
                Funded by: International Max Planck Research School for Organismal Biology;
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01330

                Ecology
                extrapair paternity,mate guarding,phalaropus fulicarius,red phalarope,sexual selection,short-term pair bond,social polyandry,sex-role reversal

                Comments

                Comment on this article