16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of incentives, age, and behavior on brain activation during inhibitory control: A longitudinal fMRI study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated changes in brain function supporting inhibitory control under age-controlled incentivized conditions, separating age- and performance-related activation in an accelerated longitudinal design including 10- to 22-year-olds. Better inhibitory control correlated with striatal activation during neutral trials, while Age × Behavior interactions in the striatum indicated that in the absence of extrinsic incentives, younger subjects with greater reward circuitry activation successfully engage in greater inhibitory control. Age was negatively correlated with ventral amygdala activation during Loss trials, suggesting that amygdala function more strongly mediates bottom-up processing earlier in development when controlling the negative aspects of incentives to support inhibitory control. Together, these results indicate that with development, reward-modulated cognitive control may be supported by incentive processing transitions in the amygdala, and from facilitative to obstructive striatal function during inhibitory control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.

          J Arnett (2000)
          Emerging adulthood is proposed as a new conception of development for the period from the late teens through the twenties, with a focus on ages 18-25. A theoretical background is presented. Then evidence is provided to support the idea that emerging adulthood is a distinct period demographically, subjectively, and in terms of identity explorations. How emerging adulthood differs from adolescence and young adulthood is explained. Finally, a cultural context for the idea of emerging adulthood is outlined, and it is specified that emerging adulthood exists only in cultures that allow young people a prolonged period of independent role exploration during the late teens and twenties.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The adolescent brain.

            Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by suboptimal decisions and actions that give rise to an increased incidence of unintentional injuries and violence, alcohol and drug abuse, unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Traditional neurobiological and cognitive explanations for adolescent behavior have failed to account for the nonlinear changes in behavior observed during adolescence, relative to childhood and adulthood. This review provides a biologically plausible conceptualization of the neural mechanisms underlying these nonlinear changes in behavior, as a heightened responsiveness to incentives while impulse control is still relatively immature during this period. Recent human imaging and animal studies provide a biological basis for this view, suggesting differential development of limbic reward systems relative to top-down control systems during adolescence relative to childhood and adulthood. This developmental pattern may be exacerbated in those adolescents with a predisposition toward risk-taking, increasing the risk for poor outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.

              People typically exhibit greater sensitivity to losses than to equivalent gains when making decisions. We investigated neural correlates of loss aversion while individuals decided whether to accept or reject gambles that offered a 50/50 chance of gaining or losing money. A broad set of areas (including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their targets) showed increasing activity as potential gains increased. Potential losses were represented by decreasing activity in several of these same gain-sensitive areas. Finally, individual differences in behavioral loss aversion were predicted by a measure of neural loss aversion in several regions, including the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                101541838
                38415
                Dev Cogn Neurosci
                Dev Cogn Neurosci
                Developmental cognitive neuroscience
                1878-9293
                1878-9307
                8 October 2014
                19 September 2014
                February 2015
                01 February 2016
                : 11
                : 105-115
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, United States
                [b ]Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, United States
                [c ]Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Laboratory of Neurocognitive Development, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Loeffler Building, 121 Meyran Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Tel.: +1 412 383 8168
                Article
                NIHMS633332
                10.1016/j.dcn.2014.09.003
                4323861
                25284272
                6aac9e70-6e66-4d5c-9a98-bdc3de3eef29
                © 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                adolescent,reward,motivation,development,inhibitory control,antisaccade
                Neurosciences
                adolescent, reward, motivation, development, inhibitory control, antisaccade

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content175

                Cited by36

                Most referenced authors874