11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic risk variants in many loci associated with multiple cancers. We sought to systematically evaluate the utility of these risk variants in identifying high-risk individuals for eight common cancers.

          Methods

          We constructed polygenic risk scores (PRS) using genome-wide association studies–identified risk variants for each cancer. Using data from 400 812 participants of European descent in a population-based cohort study, UK Biobank, we estimated hazard ratios associated with PRS using Cox proportional hazard models and evaluated the performance of the PRS in cancer risk prediction and their ability to identify individuals at more than a twofold elevated risk, a risk level comparable to a moderate-penetrance mutation in known cancer predisposition genes.

          Results

          During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 14 584 incident case patients of cancers were identified (ranging from 358 epithelial ovarian cancer case patients to 4430 prostate cancer case patients). Compared with those at an average risk, individuals among the highest 5% of the PRS had a two- to threefold elevated risk for cancer of the prostate, breast, pancreas, colorectal, or ovary, and an approximately 1.5-fold elevated risk of cancer of the lung, bladder, or kidney. The areas under the curve ranged from 0.567 to 0.662. Using PRS, 40.4% of the study participants can be classified as having more than a twofold elevated risk for at least one site-specific cancer.

          Conclusions

          A large proportion of the general population can be identified at an elevated cancer risk by PRS, supporting the potential clinical utility of PRS for personalized cancer risk prediction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

          Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In 2016, an estimated 134,000 persons will be diagnosed with the disease, and about 49,000 will die from it. Colorectal cancer is most frequently diagnosed among adults aged 65 to 74 years; the median age at death from colorectal cancer is 68 years.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles.

            We screened individuals from 443 familial breast cancer pedigrees and 521 controls for ATM sequence variants and identified 12 mutations in affected individuals and two in controls (P = 0.0047). The results demonstrate that ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia in biallelic carriers are breast cancer susceptibility alleles in monoallelic carriers, with an estimated relative risk of 2.37 (95% confidence interval (c.i.) = 1.51-3.78, P = 0.0003). There was no evidence that other classes of ATM variant confer a risk of breast cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

              Purpose Hereditary factors play an important role in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, yet the prevalence of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations in patients with CRC unselected for high-risk features (eg, early age at diagnosis, personal/family history of cancer or polyps, tumor microsatellite instability [MSI], mismatch repair [MMR] deficiency) is unknown. Patients and Methods We recruited 1,058 participants who received CRC care in a clinic-based setting without preselection for age at diagnosis, personal/family history, or MSI/MMR results. All participants underwent germline testing for mutations in 25 genes associated with inherited cancer risk. Each gene was categorized as high penetrance or moderate penetrance on the basis of published estimates of the lifetime cancer risks conferred by pathogenic germline mutations in that gene. Results One hundred five (9.9%; 95% CI, 8.2% to 11.9%) of 1,058 participants carried one or more pathogenic mutations, including 33 (3.1%) with Lynch syndrome (LS). Twenty-eight (96.6%) of 29 available LS CRCs demonstrated abnormal MSI/MMR results. Seventy-four (7.0%) of 1,058 participants carried non-LS gene mutations, including 23 (2.2%) with mutations in high-penetrance genes (five APC, three biallelic MUTYH, 11 BRCA1/2, two PALB2, one CDKN2A, and one TP53), 15 of whom lacked clinical histories suggestive of their underlying mutation. Thirty-eight (3.6%) participants had moderate-penetrance CRC risk gene mutations (19 monoallelic MUTYH, 17 APC*I1307K, two CHEK2). Neither proband age at CRC diagnosis, family history of CRC, nor personal history of other cancers significantly predicted the presence of pathogenic mutations in non-LS genes. Conclusion Germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations are carried by 9.9% of patients with CRC. MSI/MMR testing reliably identifies LS probands, although 7.0% of patients with CRC carry non-LS mutations, including 1.0% with BRCA1/2 mutations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNCI Cancer Spectr
                JNCI Cancer Spectr
                jncics
                JNCI Cancer Spectrum
                Oxford University Press
                2515-5091
                June 2020
                12 March 2020
                12 March 2020
                : 4
                : 3
                : pkaa021
                Affiliations
                [p1 ] Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN, USA
                [p2 ] Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN, USA
                [p3 ] Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN, USA
                [p4 ] Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Wei Zheng, MD, PhD, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Ave, 8th Floor, Nashville, TN 37203-1738, USA (e-mail: wei.zheng@ 123456vanderbilt.edu ).
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-2257
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-2923
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1226-070X
                Article
                pkaa021
                10.1093/jncics/pkaa021
                7306192
                32596635
                6a8c0edd-7201-4f15-9346-421367ca8a92
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 29 July 2019
                : 14 January 2020
                : 06 March 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: R01CA202981
                Award ID: R01CA235553
                Funded by: Anne Potter Wilson chair endowment at Vanderbilt University;
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article