44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      LAPAROSCOPIC PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT WITH RECTUS SHEATH TUNNELING: A ONE-PORT SIMPLIFIED TECHNIQUE Translated title: IMPLANTE LAPAROSCÓPICO DE CATETER DE DIÁLISE PERITONEAL COM TUNELIZAÇÃO NA BAINHA DO MÚSCULO RETO ABDOMINAL: TÉCNICA SIMPLIFICADA COM PORTAL ÚNICO

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND:

          The success of peritoneal dialysis depends on the proper placement and functional longevity of the dialysis catheter. Laparoscopic implantation of a catheter through a rectus sheath tunneling can minimize the risks of catheter failure.

          AIMS:

          This study aims to describe one-port simplified technique for laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter with rectus sheath tunneling.

          METHODS:

          The simplified laparoscopic insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter with rectus sheath tunneling was performed in 16 patients with chronic renal failure.

          RESULTS:

          During the follow-up period, no major complications occurred. Three patients were excluded. One was referred to the renal transplant some weeks after implantation, and one died for other reasons during the follow-up. Another patient needed adhesiolysis due to previous surgery, so an additional port was necessary. The other 13 catheters worked properly, and no postoperative hemorrhage, early leaks, hernia, or catheter migration occurred. One patient had a tunnel infection 11 months after the implant. No peritonitis was observed during the follow-up.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          The technique is simple, reproducible, and safe, with good results in catheter function, few complications, and a high catheter survival rate. It does not require a special device or trocar and avoids excessive port sites.

          RESUMO - RACIONAL:

          O sucesso da diálise peritoneal depende da implantação adequada e da longevidade funcional do cateter. O implante laparoscópico através da tunelização na bainha do reto abdominal minimiza os riscos de disfunção do cateter.

          OBJETIVOS:

          Descrever técnica simplificada com portal único para o implante laparoscópico de cateter de diálise peritoneal com tunelização na bainha do reto abdominal.

          MÉTODOS:

          Utilizou-se inserção laparoscópica de cateter de Tenckhoff com tunelização da bainha do reto em 16 pacientes com insuficiência renal crônica.

          RESULTADOS:

          Durante o período de acompanhamento não ocorreram complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. Três pacientes foram excluídos: um foi encaminhado para transplante renal algumas semanas após o implante e outro faleceu por outro motivo durante o acompanhamento. Um terceiro necessitou de lise de aderências devido à operação anterior, portanto foi necessário um portal adicional. Os outros 13 pacientes apresentaram bom funcionamento do cateter. Não houve hemorragia pós-operatória, vazamentos, hérnia ou migração do cateter. Um paciente teve infecção no túnel subcutâneo 11 meses após o implante. Não foi observada peritonite durante o período de acompanhamento.

          CONCLUSÕES:

          A técnica é simples, reprodutível, segura, com bons resultados de funcionalidade, poucas complicações e alta taxa de sobrevida do cateter. Ela não requer trocarte especial e evita o uso excessivo de portais.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Creating and Maintaining Optimal Peritoneal Dialysis Access in the Adult Patient: 2019 Update.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: patients' assessment of their satisfaction with therapy and the impact of the therapy on their lives.

            This study was undertaken to examine patient satisfaction with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) therapies, focusing attention on the positive and negative impact of the therapies on patients' lives. Patients were recruited from a free-standing PD unit and two free-standing HD units. A total of 94% (n = 62) of eligible PD and 84% (n = 84) of eligible HD patients participated. HD patients were significantly older and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than the PD patients, but there were no differences in duration of dialysis treatment, prevalence of diabetes, educational backgrounds, or home situations. Patients were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with and the overall impact of their dialysis therapy on their lives, using a 1 to 10 Likert scale. In addition, patients were asked to rate the impact of their therapy on 15 domains that had been cited previously as being important for patients' quality of life. The mean satisfaction score for PD patients (8.02 +/- 1.41) was higher than for HD patients (7.4 +/- 1.4; P = 0.15). PD patients indicated that there was less impact of the dialysis treatment on their lives globally (7.25 +/- 2.12 versus 6.19 +/- 2.83; P = 0.019). In addition, PD patients noted less impact of the therapy in 14 of the 15 domains examined. With the use of a proportional odds model analysis, the only significant predictor of overall satisfaction and impact of therapy was dialysis modality (P = 0.037 and P = 0.021, respectively). Patients also were asked to comment freely on the positive and negative effects of the dialysis treatments on their lives, and a taxonomy of patient perceptions and concerns was developed. This study suggests that PD patients in general are more satisfied with their overall care and believe that their treatment has less impact on their lives than HD patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access.

              Both medical benefits to the patient and financial incentives to the health care system exist to increase the use of peritoneal dialysis as renal replacement therapy. Providing long-term peritoneal access free of mechanical dysfunction continues to represent a major challenge to the success of this modality. Variable outcomes result from the lack of standard implantation methodology and failure to address persistent problems associated with current implantation techniques. This prospective case study compared noninfectious procedural complications of three approaches to establish peritoneal dialysis access. The groups consisted of 63 catheters implanted by traditional open dissection, 78 catheters implanted by basic laparoscopy without associated interventions, and 200 catheters implanted by advanced laparoscopic methods including rectus sheath tunneling, selective prophylactic omentopexy, and selective adhesiolysis. Mechanical flow obstruction, the major outcome indicator, followed only 1 of 200 (0.5%) implantation procedures in the advanced group and was significantly better (P < 0.0001) than the open dissection (17.5%) and basic laparoscopic (12.5%) groups. A low rate of pericannular leaks (1.3-2%) was not different for the three groups. One pericannular hernia occurred in the open group. Catheter mechanical dysfunction attributable to the surgical technique can nearly be eliminated through adjunctive procedures made possible only by a laparoscopic approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arq Bras Cir Dig
                Arq Bras Cir Dig
                abcd
                Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva : ABCD
                Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
                0102-6720
                2317-6326
                16 September 2022
                2022
                : 35
                : e1690
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Paraná Kidney Institute, Peritoneal Dialysis Service - Curitiba (PR), Brazil;
                [2 ]Santa Cruz Hospital, General Surgery Department - Curitiba (PR), Brazil;
                [3 ]Pilar Hospital, General Surgery Department - Curitiba (PR), Brazil.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Ana Carolina Buffara Blitzkow. E-mail: anacarolina@ 123456mps.com.br ; anacblitzkow@ 123456hotmail.com

                Conflict of Interest: None

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-9892
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-7990
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-8484
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-4033
                Article
                00404
                10.1590/0102-672020220002e1690
                9484823
                36134821
                6a4774c9-2189-4326-852c-38f403c0090a

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

                History
                : 15 December 2020
                : 01 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 27
                Categories
                Original Article - Technique

                peritoneal dialysis,laparoscopy,catheters,outpatients,general surgery,diálise peritoneal,laparoscopia,cateteres,pacientes ambulatoriais,cirurgia geral

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                5
                0
                4
                0
                Smart Citations
                5
                0
                4
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content45

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors211