14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Children's thoughts and feelings about their donor and security of attachment to their solo mothers in middle childhood

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          STUDY QUESTION

          What is the relationship between children's thoughts and feelings about their donor and their security of attachment to their solo mothers in middle childhood?

          SUMMARY ANSWER

          Children with higher levels of secure–autonomous attachment to their mothers were more likely to have positive perceptions of the donor, and those with higher levels of insecure–disorganized attachment to their mothers were more likely to perceive him negatively.

          WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

          There is limited understanding of the factors that contribute to children's thoughts and feelings about their donor in solo mother families. In adolescence, an association was found between adolescents’ curiosity about donor conception and their security of attachment to their mothers.

          STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

          19 children were administered the Friends and Family Interview and Donor Conception Interview between December 2015 and March 2016 as part of the second phase of a longitudinal, multi-method, multi-informant study of solo mother families.

          PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

          All children were aged between 7 and 13 years and had been conceived by donor insemination to solo mothers. Interviews were conducted in participants’ homes. The Friends and Family Interview was rated according to a standardized coding scheme designed to measure security of attachment in terms of secure–autonomous, insecure–dismissing, insecure–preoccupied and insecure–disorganized attachment patterns. Quantitative analyses of the Donor Conception Interview yielded two factors: interest in the donor and perceptions of the donor. Qualitative analyses of the Donor Conception Interview were conducted using qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis.

          MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

          Statistically significant associations were found between the perception of the donor scale and the secure–autonomous and insecure–disorganized attachment ratings. Children with higher levels of secure–autonomous attachment to their mothers were more likely to have positive perceptions of the donor ( r = 0.549, P = 0.015), and those with higher levels of insecure–disorganized attachment to their mothers were more likely to perceive him negatively ( r = −0.632, P = 0.004). Children's narratives about the donor depicted him as a stranger ( n = 8), a biological father ( n = 4), a social parent ( n = 3), or in ambivalent terms ( n = 4).

          LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

          Findings are limited by the wide age range of children within a small overall sample size. Participants were those willing and able to take part in research on donor conception families. The statistical significance of correlation coefficients was not corrected for multiple comparisons.

          WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

          Findings highlight the importance of situating children's ideas about the donor within family contexts. It is recommended that those working with donor conception families consider this when advising parents about whether, what and how to tell children about donor conception.

          STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

          This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust [097857/Z/11/Z]. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Qualitative Content Analysis

          The article describes an approach of systematic, rule guided qualitative text analysis, which tries to preserve some methodological strengths of quantitative content analysis and widen them to a concept of qualitative procedure. First the development of content analysis is delineated and the basic principles are explained (units of analysis, step models, working with categories, validity and reliability). Then the central procedures of qualitative content analysis, inductive development of categories and deductive application of categories, are worked out. The possibilities of computer programs in supporting those qualitative steps of analysis are shown and the possibilities and limits of the approach are discussed. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204 Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 1, No 2 (2000): Qualitative Methods in Various Disciplines I: Psychology
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 23: medically assisted reproduction in singles, lesbian and gay couples, and transsexual people†.

            This Task Force document discusses ethical issues arising with requests for medically assisted reproduction from people in what may be called 'non-standard' situations and relationships. The document stresses that categorically denying access to any of these groups cannot be reconciled with a human rights perspective. If there are concerns about the implications of assisted reproduction on the wellbeing of any of the persons involved, including the future child, a surrogate mother or the applicants themselves, these concerns have to be considered in the light of the available scientific evidence. When doing so it is important to avoid the use of double standards. More research is needed into the psychosocial implications of raising children in non-standard situations, especially with regard to single women, male homosexual couples and transsexual people.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds.

              Donor insemination programs can include 'open-identity' sperm donors, who are willing to release their identities to adult offspring. We report findings from adolescent offspring who have open-identity donors. Using mail-back questionnaires, youths from 29 households (41.4% headed by lesbian couples, 37.9% by single women, 20.7% by heterosexual couples) reported their experience growing up knowing how they were conceived and their interest in the donor's identity. Most youths (75.9%) reported always knowing, and were somewhat to very comfortable with their conception origins. All but one felt knowing had a neutral to positive impact on their relationship with their birth mother and, separately, co-parent. The youths' top question about the donor was, 'What's he like?' and >80% felt at least moderately likely to request his identity and pursue contact. Finally, of those who might contact the donor, 82.8% would do so to learn more about him, with many believing it would help them learn more about themselves. No youth reported wanting money and few (6.9%) wanted a father/child relationship. We also discuss differences found among youths from different household types. The majority of the youths felt comfortable with their origins and planned to obtain their donor's identity, although not necessarily at age 18.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Reprod
                Hum. Reprod
                humrep
                Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
                Oxford University Press
                0268-1161
                1460-2350
                April 2017
                10 February 2017
                10 February 2017
                : 32
                : 4
                : 868-875
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge , Free School Lane, CambridgeCB2 3RQ, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence address. Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. E-mail: sz255@ 123456cam.ac.uk
                Article
                dex016
                10.1093/humrep/dex016
                5400065
                28184441
                6a217a9f-2c3a-476c-848a-1e4ac57c0604
                © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 August 2016
                : 10 January 2017
                : 27 January 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100004440
                Award ID: 097857/Z/11/Z
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Psychology and Counselling

                Human biology
                donor conception,solo mother,children's perspectives,attachment,mother–child relationships

                Comments

                Comment on this article