Effects of arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair on function, pain &amp; range of motion. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair on function, pain and range of motion at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow ups.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS One

Title: PloS one

Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)

ISSN (Electronic): 1932-6203

ISSN (Print): 1932-6203

Publication date (Electronic): 2019

Volume: 14

Issue: 10

Affiliations

[1 ] School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

[2 ] Collaborative Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research, Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, ON Canada.

[3 ] Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada.

[4 ] Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Canada.

Article

Publisher Item ID: PONE-D-19-10585

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222953

PMC ID: 6822715

PubMed ID: 31671101

SO-VID: 69ce6823-8d12-4f43-a630-0e935c9dbede

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 9

See all cited by

Effects of arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair on function, pain & range of motion. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Read this article at

PLOS Climate

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Comment on this article