15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A non-archaeopterygid avialan theropod from the Late Jurassic of southern Germany

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Late Jurassic ‘Solnhofen Limestones’ are famous for their exceptionally preserved fossils, including the urvogel Archaeopteryx, which has played a pivotal role in the discussion of bird origins. Here we describe a new, non-archaeopterygid avialan from the Lower Tithonian Mörnsheim Formation of the Solnhofen Archipelago, Alcmonavis poeschli gen. et sp. nov. Represented by a right wing, Alcmonavis shows several derived characters, including a pronounced attachment for the pectoralis muscle, a pronounced tuberculum bicipitale radii, and a robust second manual digit, indicating that it is a more derived avialan than Archaeopteryx. Several modifications, especially in muscle attachments of muscles that in modern birds are related to the downstroke of the wing, indicate an increased adaptation of the forelimb for active flapping flight in the early evolution of birds. This discovery indicates higher avialan diversity in the Late Jurassic than previously recognized.

          eLife digest

          The origin of birds and their flight has been heavily debated in the field of evolutionary biology since the late nineteenth century. Birds are the only living descendants of dinosaurs and, for paleontologists, the famous Archaeopteryx has played a pivotal role in this discussion. Living during the Jurassic period about 150 million years ago in what is now southern Germany, Archaeopteryx is generally accepted as the oldest known flying bird. Yet, with the discovery of other bird-like dinosaurs from the same period, a question has arisen as to whether Archaeopteryx is the only flying bird from the Jurassic.

          To answer this question, Rauhut et al. carefully examined a fossil of an isolated wing skeleton that was recently discovered in the same region of Germany where Archaeopteryx was found. The new specimen shows several characteristics that are otherwise only found in modern birds and not seen in Archaeopteryx. As such, this fossil represents a new species and the most bird-like bird discovered from the Jurassic. Rauhut et al. named the species Alcmonavis poeschli, after the ancient name for a river that flows near the discovery site, the Greek word for bird, and Roland Pöschl – the collector who found the specimen.

          The wing of Alcmonavis also shows several features related to the attachment of flight muscles that suggest it was better adapted for flapping flight than Archaeopteryx. Together these findings are mostly consistent with the hypothesis that birds first started flying by flapping their wings rather than starting from a gliding stage. However, more detailed studies of the anatomy of primitive birds and their close relatives are needed to further test this hypothesis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references111

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology

            One of the lasting controversies in phylogenetic inference is the degree to which specific evolutionary models should influence the choice of methods. Model-based approaches to phylogenetic inference (likelihood, Bayesian) are defended on the premise that without explicit statistical models there is no science, and parsimony is defended on the grounds that it provides the best rationalization of the data, while refraining from assigning specific probabilities to trees or character-state reconstructions. Authors who favour model-based approaches often focus on the statistical properties of the methods and models themselves, but this is of only limited use in deciding the best method for phylogenetic inference-such decision also requires considering the conditions of evolution that prevail in nature. Another approach is to compare the performance of parsimony and model-based methods in simulations, which traditionally have been used to defend the use of models of evolution for DNA sequences. Some recent papers, however, have promoted the use of model-based approaches to phylogenetic inference for discrete morphological data as well. These papers simulated data under models already known to be unfavourable to parsimony, and modelled morphological evolution as if it evolved just like DNA, with probabilities of change for all characters changing in concert along tree branches. The present paper discusses these issues, showing that under reasonable and less restrictive models of evolution for discrete characters, equally weighted parsimony performs as well or better than model-based methods, and that parsimony under implied weights clearly outperforms all other methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Review of Dromaeosaurid Systematics and Paravian Phylogeny

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing Editor
                Role: Senior Editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                14 May 2019
                2019
                : 8
                : e43789
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptStaatliche naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB) Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie MünchenGermany
                [2 ]deptDepartment for Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology and Geobiology Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGermany
                [3 ]deptGeoBioCenter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGermany
                [4 ]Tannenweg 16 StammhamGermany
                [5 ]deptDepartment of Geosciences Université de Fribourg FribourgSwitzerland
                Flinders University Australia
                Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology Germany
                Flinders University Australia
                Flinders University Australia
                Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China China
                Author notes

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-603X
                Article
                43789
                10.7554/eLife.43789
                6516837
                31084702
                69747666-8173-400b-a2be-e1aeeb577193
                © 2019, Rauhut et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 November 2018
                : 10 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001663, Volkswagen Foundation;
                Award ID: I/84 640
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung;
                Award ID: PZ00P2_174040
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Evolutionary Biology
                Custom metadata
                A new taxon from the Late Jurassic of southern Germany represents the second volant bird known from that time period and documents the improvement of flapping flight in bird evolution.

                Life sciences
                late jurassic,bird evolution,flight,other
                Life sciences
                late jurassic, bird evolution, flight, other

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content572

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors763