6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A review of global strategies promoting the conversion of food waste to bioenergy via anaerobic digestion

      , , , ,
      Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges.

          This paper presents an examination of MSW generation and composition in China, providing an overview of the current state of MSW management, an analysis of existing problems in MSW collection, separation, recycling and disposal, and some suggestions for improving MSW systems in the future. In China, along with urbanization, population growth and industrialization, the quantity of municipal solid waste (MSW) generation has been increasing rapidly. The total MSW amount increased from 31.3 million tonnes in 1980 to 212 million tonnes in 2006, and the waste generation rate increased from 0.50 kg/capita/day in 1980 to 0.98 kg/capita/year in 2006. Currently, waste composition in China is dominated by a high organic and moisture content, since the concentration of kitchen waste in urban solid waste makes up the highest proportion (at approximately 60%) of the waste stream. The total amount of MSW collected and transported was 148 million tonnes in 2006, of which 91.4% was landfilled, 6.4% was incinerated and 2.2% was composted. The overall MSW treatment rate in China was approximately 62% in 2007. In 2007, there were 460 facilities, including 366 landfill sites, 17 composing plants, and 66 incineration plants. This paper also considers the challenges faced and opportunities for MSW management in China, and a number of recommendations are made aimed at improving the MSW management system. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An overview of food waste management in developing countries: Current status and future perspective

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure.

              This study assessed the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure, in order to identify the key parameters that determine the biogas and methane yield. Results of both batch and semi-continuous tests indicated that the total methane production is enhanced in co-digestion, with an optimum food waste (FM) to cattle manure (CM) ratio of 2. At this ratio, the total methane production in batch tests was enhanced by 41.1%, and the corresponding methane yield was 388 mL/g-VS. In the semi-continuous mode, the total methane production in co-digestion, at the organic loading rate (OLR) of 10 g-VSFW/L/d, increased by 55.2%, corresponding to the methane yield of 317 mL/g-VS. Addition of cattle manure enhanced the buffer capacity (created by NH4+ and VFAs), allowing high organic load without pH control. The C/N ratio and the higher biodegradation of lipids might be the main reasons for the biogas production improvement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
                Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
                Elsevier BV
                13640321
                November 2017
                November 2017
                : 79
                : 204-221
                Article
                10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.047
                692259b8-090a-4404-b81d-6327ed0e31c8
                © 2017

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article