10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      XCO<sub>2</sub> in an emission hot-spot region: the COCCON Paris campaign 2015

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Providing timely information on urban Greenhouse-Gas (GHG) emissions and their trends to stakeholders relies on reliable measurements of atmospheric concentrations and the understanding of how local emissions and atmospheric transport influence these observations.</p> <p>Portable Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectrometers were deployed at 5 stations in the Paris metropolitan area to provide column-averaged concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> (XCO<sub>2</sub>) during a field campaign in spring of 2015. Here, we describe and analyze the variations of XCO<sub>2</sub> observed at different sites and how they changed over time. We find that observations upwind and downwind of the city centre differ significantly in their XCO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, while the overall variability of the daily cycle is similar, i.e., increasing during night-time with a strong decrease (typically 2&amp;ndash;3<span class="thinspace"></span>ppm) during the afternoon.</p> <p>An atmospheric transport model framework (CHIMERE-CAMS) was used to simulate XCO<sub>2</sub> and predict the same behaviour seen in the observations, which supports key findings, e.g. that even in a densely populated region like Paris (over 12 Million people), biospheric uptake of CO<sub>2</sub> can be of major influence on daily XCO<sub>2</sub> variations. Despite a general offset between modelled and observed XCO<sub>2</sub>, the model correctly predicts the impact of the meteorological parameters (e.g. wind direction and speed) on the concentration gradients between different stations. Looking at the local gradients of XCO<sub>2</sub> for upwind and downwind station pairs, which is less sensitive to changes in XCO<sub>2</sub> regional background conditions, we find the model-data agreement significantly better. Our modelling framework indicates that the local XCO<sub>2</sub> gradient between the stations is dominated by the fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> signal of the Paris metropolitan area. This highlights the usefulness of XCO<sub>2</sub> observations to help optimise future urban GHG emission estimates.</p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
          Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.
          Copernicus GmbH
          1680-7375
          July 25 2018
          : 1-37
          Article
          10.5194/acp-2018-595
          67e30c6b-ef6a-4be5-b7be-2e3d1622d740
          © 2018

          https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article