6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Benefits and Limitations of the Record and Replay Approach for GNSS Receiver Performance Assessment in Harsh Scenarios

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Global navigation satellite systems play a significant role in the development of intelligent transport systems, where the estimation of the vehicle’s position is a key element. However, in strongly constrained environments such as city centers, the definition of quality metrics and the assessment of positioning performances are challenges to be addressed. Due to the variability of different urban scenarios, the modeling of the dynamics as well as the architecture of the positioning platform, which might embed other sensors and aiding means to the GNSS unit, make it hard to define unambiguous positioning metrics. Performance assessment through analytical models and simulators can be ineffective in terms of cost, complexity, and general validity and scalability of the results. This paper shows how a record and replay approach can be an efficient solution to grant fidelity to a realistic scenario. This work discusses advantages and disadvantages with emphasis on the case study of harsh scenarios. Such an approach requires proper data collections that allow the replay phase to test the GNSS-based positioning terminals. This paper presents the results obtained on a set of field tests related to different scenarios, selected as representative for the key performance indicators assessment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication in a heterogeneous wireless network – Performance evaluation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Loose and Tight GNSS/INS Integrations: Comparison of Performance Assessed in Real Urban Scenarios

            Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) remain the principal mean of positioning in many applications and systems, but in several types of environment, the performance of standalone receivers is degraded. Although many works show the benefits of the integration between GNSS and Inertial Navigation Systems (INSs), tightly-coupled architectures are mainly implemented in professional devices and are based on high-grade Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). This paper investigates the performance improvements enabled by the tight integration, using low-cost sensors and a mass-market GNSS receiver. Performance is assessed through a series of tests carried out in real urban scenarios and is compared against commercial modules, operating in standalone mode or featuring loosely-coupled integrations. The paper describes the developed tight-integration algorithms with a terse mathematical model and assesses their efficacy from a practical perspective.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Methodology for the Evaluation of a GPS Receiver Performance in Telematics Applications

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                07 July 2018
                July 2018
                : 18
                : 7
                : 2189
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy; fabio.dovis@ 123456polito.it
                [2 ]Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Geodeetinrinne 2, 02430 Masala, Finland; laura.ruotsalainen@ 123456nls.fi
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: calogero.cristodaro@ 123456polito.it ; Tel.: +39-011-227-6442
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-3918
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-4143
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6078-9099
                Article
                sensors-18-02189
                10.3390/s18072189
                6068764
                29986503
                679cc990-2a75-4343-8792-bc30aaf7415b
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 June 2018
                : 05 July 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                gnss,sdr,record and replay,gnss receiver testing,rf front-end
                Biomedical engineering
                gnss, sdr, record and replay, gnss receiver testing, rf front-end

                Comments

                Comment on this article