2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Performance of Three Measures of Comorbidity in Predicting Critical COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis of 4607 Hospitalized Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Comorbidity burden has been identified as a relevant predictor of critical illness in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, comorbidity burden is often represented by a simple count of few conditions that may not fully capture patients’ complexity.

          Purpose

          To evaluate the performance of a comprehensive index of the comorbidity burden (Queralt DxS), which includes all chronic conditions present on admission, as an adjustment variable in models for predicting critical illness in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and compare it with two broadly used measures of comorbidity.

          Materials and Methods

          We analyzed data from all COVID-19 hospitalizations reported in eight public hospitals in Catalonia (North-East Spain) between June 15 and December 8 2020. The primary outcome was a composite of critical illness that included the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, transfer to ICU, or in-hospital death. Predictors including age, sex, and comorbidities present on admission measured using three indices: the Charlson index, the Elixhauser index, and the Queralt DxS index for comorbidities on admission. The performance of different fitted models was compared using various indicators, including the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC).

          Results

          Our analysis included 4607 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Of them, 1315 experienced critical illness. Comorbidities significantly contributed to predicting the outcome in all summary indices used. AUC (95% CI) for prediction of critical illness was 0.641 (0.624–0.660) for the Charlson index, 0.665 (0.645–0.681) for the Elixhauser index, and 0.787 (0.773–0.801) for the Queralt DxS index. Other metrics of model performance also showed Queralt DxS being consistently superior to the other indices.

          Conclusion

          In our analysis, the ability of comorbidity indices to predict critical illness in hospitalized COVID-19 patients increased with their exhaustivity. The comprehensive Queralt DxS index may improve the accuracy of predictive models for resource allocation and clinical decision-making in the hospital setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

          The objective of this study was to develop a prospectively applicable method for classifying comorbid conditions which might alter the risk of mortality for use in longitudinal studies. A weighted index that takes into account the number and the seriousness of comorbid disease was developed in a cohort of 559 medical patients. The 1-yr mortality rates for the different scores were: "0", 12% (181); "1-2", 26% (225); "3-4", 52% (71); and "greater than or equal to 5", 85% (82). The index was tested for its ability to predict risk of death from comorbid disease in the second cohort of 685 patients during a 10-yr follow-up. The percent of patients who died of comorbid disease for the different scores were: "0", 8% (588); "1", 25% (54); "2", 48% (25); "greater than or equal to 3", 59% (18). With each increased level of the comorbidity index, there were stepwise increases in the cumulative mortality attributable to comorbid disease (log rank chi 2 = 165; p less than 0.0001). In this longer follow-up, age was also a predictor of mortality (p less than 0.001). The new index performed similarly to a previous system devised by Kaplan and Feinstein. The method of classifying comorbidity provides a simple, readily applicable and valid method of estimating risk of death from comorbid disease for use in longitudinal studies. Further work in larger populations is still required to refine the approach because the number of patients with any given condition in this study was relatively small.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new look at the statistical model identification

            IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                rmhp
                Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
                Dove
                1179-1594
                23 November 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 4729-4737
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Catalan Institute of Health , Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System (DS3), Sistema de Salut de Catalunya , Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]Servei Català de la Salut , Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist , Houston, TX, USA
                [5 ]Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore, MD, USA
                [6 ]CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) , Barcelona, Spain
                [7 ]Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat , Barcelona, Spain
                [8 ]Bioheart-Cardiovascular Diseases Research Group (Idibell), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat , Barcelona, Spain
                [9 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universität de Barcelona - UB, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat , Barcelona, Spain
                [10 ]Open Evidence Research Group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya , Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jordi Piera-Jiménez Servei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Travessera de les Corts , 131-159 (Edifici Olímpia), Barcelona, 08028, Spain Tel +34 634283110 Email jpiera@catsalut.cat
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-0455
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-7975
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-128X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-0951
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-9112
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6471-9979
                Article
                326132
                10.2147/RMHP.S326132
                8627311
                34849041
                677b4b1c-4433-422e-a09c-8c25e9c167ea
                © 2021 Monterde et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 28 June 2021
                : 14 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 8, References: 38, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Original Research

                Social policy & Welfare
                comorbidity,multimorbidity,covid-19,hospitalization,risk
                Social policy & Welfare
                comorbidity, multimorbidity, covid-19, hospitalization, risk

                Comments

                Comment on this article