0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A phase 2 trial investigating the effects of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist C21 in systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud’s

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Our main aim was to investigate the effect of a single oral dose of C21, a selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist, on cold-induced vasoconstriction in SSc-related RP.

          Methods

          This was a phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, cross-over, single-dose, placebo-controlled, single-centre study. Twelve female patients with SSc (median age 58.5 years, median duration of RP 19.0 years) attended on four occasions: screening, treatment visits 1 and 2 (separated by 3–7 days) and follow-up. At the first treatment visit, patients were randomized to receive either a single oral dose of C21 (200 mg) or placebo, then the opposite treatment on the second visit. Forty min after each treatment, each patient underwent a standard hand cold challenge. The primary end point was the area under the curve (AUC) for rewarming for each finger (eight fingers) over 15 min. Secondary end points included the maximum finger temperature after rewarming (MAX). Statistical analyses were performed by multiplicative ANCOVA models.

          Results

          For all eight fingers combined, mean AUC for rewarming was higher after treatment with C21 than after placebo (geometric mean 20 046°C*s vs 19 558°C*s), but not significantly ( P = 0.380) and MAX (at 15 min) was also higher (geometric mean 23.5°C vs 22.5°C; P = 0.036). C21 was well tolerated.

          Conclusion

          Despite the small trial size, a signal emerged suggesting that even in patients with established SSc, C21 may confer benefit for RP and deserves further investigation.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04388176.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

          The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by 1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and 2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, 7 additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease. Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Angiotensin II Signal Transduction: An Update on Mechanisms of Physiology and Pathophysiology

            The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays crucial roles in cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology. However, many of the signaling mechanisms have been unclear. The angiotensin II (ANG II) type 1 receptor (AT 1 R) is believed to mediate most functions of ANG II in the system. AT 1 R utilizes various signal transduction cascades causing hypertension, cardiovascular remodeling, and end organ damage. Moreover, functional cross-talk between AT 1 R signaling pathways and other signaling pathways have been recognized. Accumulating evidence reveals the complexity of ANG II signal transduction in pathophysiology of the vasculature, heart, kidney, and brain, as well as several pathophysiological features, including inflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and aging. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update of the ANG II receptor signaling events and their functional significances for potential translation into therapeutic strategies. AT 1 R remains central to the system in mediating physiological and pathophysiological functions of ANG II, and participation of specific signaling pathways becomes much clearer. There are still certain limitations and many controversies, and several noteworthy new concepts require further support. However, it is expected that rigorous translational research of the ANG II signaling pathways including those in large animals and humans will contribute to establishing effective new therapies against various diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

              The aim was to update the 2009 European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc), with attention to new therapeutic questions. Update of the previous treatment recommendations was performed according to EULAR standard operating procedures. The task force consisted of 32 SSc clinical experts from Europe and the USA, 2 patients nominated by the pan-European patient association for SSc (Federation of European Scleroderma Associations (FESCA)), a clinical epidemiologist and 2 research fellows. All centres from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group were invited to submit and select clinical questions concerning SSc treatment using a Delphi approach. Accordingly, 46 clinical questions addressing 26 different interventions were selected for systematic literature review. The new recommendations were based on the available evidence and developed in a consensus meeting with clinical experts and patients. The procedure resulted in 16 recommendations being developed (instead of 14 in 2009) that address treatment of several SSc-related organ complications: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DUs), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), skin and lung disease, scleroderma renal crisis and gastrointestinal involvement. Compared with the 2009 recommendations, the 2016 recommendations include phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the treatment of SSc-related RP and DUs, riociguat, new aspects for endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues and PDE-5 inhibitors for SSc-related PAH. New recommendations regarding the use of fluoxetine for SSc-related RP and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for selected patients with rapidly progressive SSc were also added. In addition, several comments regarding other treatments addressed in clinical questions and suggestions for the SSc research agenda were formulated. These updated data-derived and consensus-derived recommendations will help rheumatologists to manage patients with SSc in an evidence-based way. These recommendations also give directions for future clinical research in SSc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Rheumatology (Oxford)
                Rheumatology (Oxford)
                brheum
                Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
                Oxford University Press
                1462-0324
                1462-0332
                February 2023
                27 July 2022
                27 July 2022
                : 62
                : 2
                : 824-828
                Affiliations
                Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
                NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester, UK
                Vicore Pharma AB , Gothenburg
                Vicore Pharma AB , Gothenburg
                Vicore Pharma AB , Gothenburg
                Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
                Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester, UK
                Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
                Respiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Ariane Herrick, The University of Manchester, Salford Care Organisation, Salford M6 8HD, UK. E-mail: ariane.herrick@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4941-7926
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9244-2882
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-2721
                Article
                keac426
                10.1093/rheumatology/keac426
                9891408
                35894657
                67552527-b21d-495d-a30f-fb0ba8a07954
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 10 May 2022
                : 19 July 2022
                : 25 August 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Funding
                Funded by: Vicore Pharma AB;
                Categories
                Clinical Science
                AcademicSubjects/MED00360

                Rheumatology
                angiotensin ii type 2 receptor agonist,randomized controlled trial,rp,thermography,ssc

                Comments

                Comment on this article