40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Is It High Enough to Justify Bilateral Mastectomy?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Women with DCIS are increasingly choosing bilateral mastectomy. We sought to quantify rates of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS, and to compare risk factors for CBC and IBTR.

          Methods

          From 1978–2011, DCIS patients undergoing BCS with a contralateral breast at risk were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Association of clinicopathologic and treatment factors with CBC and IBTR were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and competing risk regression (CRR).

          Results

          Of 2759 patients identified, 151 developed CBC and 344 IBTR. 5- and 10-year Kaplan-Meier CBC rates were 3.2% and 6.4%. Overall, 10-year IBTR rates were 2.5-fold higher than CBC rates, and without radiation, 4-fold higher. On CRR, 5- and 10-year rates were 2.9% and 5.8% for CBC, and 7.8% and 14.5% for IBTR. CBC risk (Kaplan-Meier and CRR multivariable analysis) and invasive CBC risk (CRR multivariable analysis) were not significantly associated with age, family history, presentation, nuclear grade, year of surgery, or radiation. By Kaplan-Meier, endocrine therapy was associated with lower CBC risk (HR 0.57, p=0.03). 10-year risk of subsequent CBC in the subset of patients who developed IBTR was similar to the cohort as a whole (8.1% vs. 6.4%).

          Conclusions

          Rates of CBC were low across all groups, including those who experienced IBTR. CBC was not associated with factors that increase IBTR risk. While factors associated with IBTR risk are important in decision-making regarding management of the index DCIS, they are not an indication for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          9420840
          8578
          Ann Surg Oncol
          Ann. Surg. Oncol.
          Annals of surgical oncology
          1068-9265
          1534-4681
          7 December 2017
          01 August 2017
          October 2017
          01 October 2018
          : 24
          : 10
          : 2889-2897
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
          [2 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Kimberly J. Van Zee, MS, MD, FACS, Attending Surgeon, Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Professor of Surgery, Weill Medical College at Cornell University, 300 East 66 th Street, New York, NY 10065, (T) 646-888-5362, (F) 646-888-4920, vanzeek@ 123456mskcc.org
          [*]

          ORCID No. 0000-0001-9550-4647

          Article
          PMC5728655 PMC5728655 5728655 nihpa924700
          10.1245/s10434-017-5931-2
          5728655
          28766208
          667ac87e-486f-4cb7-81a8-5f5723ce6fb7
          History
          Categories
          Article

          ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence,ductal carcinoma in situ,characteristics of initial DCIS,breast-conserving surgery,bilateral mastectomy,contralateral breast cancer risk

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          33
          3
          15
          1
          Smart Citations
          33
          3
          15
          1
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content200

          Cited by15