31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the types of injuries associated with standing electric scooter use and the characteristics and behaviors of injured patients?

          Findings

          In this study of a case series, 249 patients presented to the emergency department with injuries associated with electric scooter use during a 1-year period, with 10.8% of patients younger than 18 years and only 4.4% of riders documented to be wearing a helmet. The most common injuries were fractures (31.7%), head injuries (40.2%), and soft-tissue injuries (27.7%).

          Meaning

          In this study, injuries associated with electric scooter use were common, ranged in severity, and suggest low rates of adherence to existing regulations around rider age and low rates of helmet use.

          Abstract

          This study of a case series investigates injuries associated with standing electric scooter use, characteristics and outcomes of injured patients, and common use practices of scooters in a US city.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Since September 2017, standing electric scooters have proliferated rapidly as an inexpensive, easy mode of transportation. Although there are regulations for safe riding established by both electric scooter companies and local governments, public common use practices and the incidence and types of injuries associated with these standing electric scooters are unknown.

          Objective

          To characterize injuries associated with standing electric scooter use, the clinical outcomes of injured patients, and common use practices in the first US metropolitan area to experience adoption of this technology.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This study of a case series used retrospective cohort medical record review of all patients presenting with injuries associated with standing electric scooter use between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2018, at 2 urban emergency departments associated with an academic medical center in Southern California. All electric scooter riders at selected public intersections in the community surrounding the 2 hospitals were also observed during a 7-hour observation period in September 2018.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Incidence and characteristics of injuries and observation of riders’ common use practices.

          Results

          Two hundred forty-nine patients (145 [58.2%] male; mean [SD] age, 33.7 [15.3] years) presented to the emergency department with injuries associated with standing electric scooter use during the study period. Two hundred twenty-eight (91.6%) were injured as riders and 21 (8.4%) as nonriders. Twenty-seven patients were younger than 18 years (10.8%). Ten riders (4.4%) were documented as having worn a helmet, and 12 patients (4.8%) had either a blood alcohol level greater than 0.05% or were perceived to be intoxicated by a physician. Frequent injuries included fractures (79 [31.7%]), head injury (100 [40.2%]), and contusions, sprains, and lacerations without fracture or head injury (69 [27.7%]). The majority of patients (234 [94.0%]) were discharged home from the emergency department; of the 15 admitted patients, 2 had severe injuries and were admitted to the intensive care unit. Among 193 observed electric scooter riders in the local community in September 2018, 182 (94.3%) were not wearing a helmet.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Injuries associated with standing electric scooter use are a new phenomenon and vary in severity. In this study, helmet use was low and a significant subset of injuries occurred in patients younger than 18 years, the minimum age permitted by private scooter company regulations. These findings may inform public policy regarding standing electric scooter use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Serious injuries related to the Segway® personal transporter: a case series.

          We describe a case series of emergency department (ED) visits for injuries related to the Segway® personal transporter.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Segway® related injuries in Vienna: report from the Lorenz Böhler Trauma Centre.

            The Segway® vehicle facilitates a new way of eco-friendly mobility and is currently used all over the world. In the last years, the use of the Segway® transporters for sightseeing tours in Vienna has increased distinctly, resulting in a growing number of Segway® related injuries and subsequent admissions of these patients to the Lorenz Böhler Trauma Centre in Vienna, Austria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Segway® Personal Transporter-Related Injuries: A Systematic Literature Review and Implications for Acute and Emergency Care

              The Segway® Personal Transporter™ (SPT) is used widely as a means of transport for city sightseeing tours, law enforcement, and professionals working in large facilities and factories.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                25 January 2019
                January 2019
                25 January 2019
                : 2
                : 1
                : e187381
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Veterans Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
                [2 ]National Clinician Scholars Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
                [3 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
                [4 ]Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles
                [6 ]Office of Health Informatics and Analytics, UCLA Health, University of California, Los Angeles
                [7 ]Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 29, 2018.
                Published: January 25, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Trivedi TK et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author : Tarak K. Trivedi, MD, MS, National Clinician Scholar Program, University of California, Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Ave, Ste 900, Los Angeles, CA 90024 ( tktrivedi@ 123456mednet.ucla.edu ).
                Author Contributions : Drs Trivedi and Liu had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Trivedi, Antonio, Wheaton, Kreger, Yap, Schriger, Elmore.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Trivedi, Liu, Antonio, Wheaton, Kreger, Yap, Schriger.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Trivedi, Liu, Antonio, Wheaton, Kreger, Yap, Schriger.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Trivedi, Liu, Wheaton, Kreger, Yap, Schriger, Elmore.
                Statistical analysis: Trivedi, Antonio, Wheaton, Schriger.
                Obtained funding: Elmore.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Trivedi, Schriger.
                Supervision: Schriger, Elmore.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: Drs Trivedi and Liu were supported by the UCLA National Clinician Scholars Program at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Drs Trivedi and Liu are supported by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations through the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program. Dr Schriger’s time was supported in part by a grant from the Korein Foundation.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The contents do not represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.
                Article
                zoi180307
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381
                6484536
                30681711
                6667ce30-e9ca-4be1-84d5-419f60cee72d
                Copyright 2019 Trivedi TK et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 10 October 2018
                : 28 November 2018
                : 29 November 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Emergency Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article