39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 2
      Global Change Biology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?

          The decomposition and transformation of above- and below-ground plant detritus (litter) is the main process by which soil organic matter (SOM) is formed. Yet, research on litter decay and SOM formation has been largely uncoupled, failing to provide an effective nexus between these two fundamental processes for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling and storage. We present the current understanding of the importance of microbial substrate use efficiency and C and N allocation in controlling the proportion of plant-derived C and N that is incorporated into SOM, and of soil matrix interactions in controlling SOM stabilization. We synthesize this understanding into the Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework. This framework leads to the hypothesis that labile plant constituents are the dominant source of microbial products, relative to input rates, because they are utilized more efficiently by microbes. These microbial products of decomposition would thus become the main precursors of stable SOM by promoting aggregation and through strong chemical bonding to the mineral soil matrix. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide.

            Worldwide decomposition rates depend both on climate and the legacy of plant functional traits as litter quality. To quantify the degree to which functional differentiation among species affects their litter decomposition rates, we brought together leaf trait and litter mass loss data for 818 species from 66 decomposition experiments on six continents. We show that: (i) the magnitude of species-driven differences is much larger than previously thought and greater than climate-driven variation; (ii) the decomposability of a species' litter is consistently correlated with that species' ecological strategy within different ecosystems globally, representing a new connection between whole plant carbon strategy and biogeochemical cycling. This connection between plant strategies and decomposability is crucial for both understanding vegetation-soil feedbacks, and for improving forecasts of the global carbon cycle.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Change Biology
                Glob Change Biol
                Wiley
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                August 22 2019
                November 2019
                September 18 2019
                November 2019
                : 25
                : 11
                : 3578-3590
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang China
                [2 ]Department of Environmental Biotechnology Helmholtz‐Centre for Environmental Research‐UFZ Leipzig Germany
                [3 ]Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation ‐ Soil Science and Soil Ecology University of Bonn Bonn Germany
                [4 ]School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Soil and Crop Sciences Cornell University Ithaca NY USA
                [5 ]Institute for Advanced studies Technical University Munich Garching Germany
                Article
                10.1111/gcb.14781
                31365780
                664e996a-da1c-4518-8c8f-396ac7aee974
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article