26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The use of herbal medicines by people with cancer: a cross-sectional survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          A large proportion of cancer patients are estimated to use herbal medicines, but data to substantiate this are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of herbal medicine use among cancer patients in the West Midlands, and determine the characteristics predicting herbal medicine use.

          Methods:

          A cross-sectional survey of oncology patients ( n=1498) being followed up at a hospital in Coventry was undertaken. Recipients were asked about herbal medicine use since their cancer diagnosis, and the association between sociodemographic and cancer-related characteristics and herbal medicine use was evaluated.

          Results:

          A total of 1134 responses were received (75.7%). The prevalence of herbal medicine use was 19.7% (95% CI: 17.4–22.1; n=223). Users were more likely to be affluent, female, and aged under 50 years. Usage increased with time since cancer diagnosis ( X 2 for trend=4.63; P=0.031). A validation data set, derived from a survey of oncology patients in Birmingham ( n=541) with differing socioeconomic characteristics showed no significant difference in estimated prevalence (16.6% 95% CI: 11.9–22.2).

          Conclusion:

          A substantial number of people with cancer are likely to be taking herbal medicines. Understanding the self-medication behaviours of these individuals is essential if health-care professionals are to support treatment adherence and avoid unwanted pharmacological interactions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review.

          Complementary/alternative cancer treatments are believed to be prevalent. However, reliable prevalence rates do not exist. The aim of this review was to summarize the existing data on this topic. A series of computerized literature searches was performed to locate all published studies documenting the prevalence of complementary and/or alternative therapy (CAM) use among patients with cancer. A total of 26 surveys from 13 countries, including 4 studies of pediatric patients, was retrieved. The use of CAM therapies in adult populations ranged from 7-64%. The average prevalence across all adult studies was 31.4%. This large degree of variability most likely is due to different understandings of "complementary/alternative medicine" on the part of both investigators and patients. It is likely that the results of the current study reflect the primarily adjunctive use of CAM treatments. Future studies should use a standardized protocol to determine the true prevalence of these therapies more closely.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine: a systematic review.

            Reported are the results of a systematic review of the prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine. Computerized literature searches were carried out in four databases. Twelve surveys thus found were selected because they dealt with the utilization of complementary/alternative medicine in random or representative samples of the general population. Data were extracted in a predefined, standardized way. Prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine ranged from 9% to 65%. Even for a given form of treatment such as chiropractic, as used in the USA, considerable discrepancies emerged. The data suggest that complementary/alternative therapies are used frequently and increasingly. Prevalence of use seemed to depend critically on factors that were poorly controlled in surveys of complementary/alternative medicine. The true prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine in the general population remains uncertain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Herbal medicine: women's views, knowledge and interaction with doctors: a qualitative study

              Background There is growing concern that serious interactions are occurring between prescribed/over the counter and herbal medicines and that there is a lack of disclosure of herbal use by patients to doctors. This study explores women's perspectives about the safety of herbal remedies, herb-drug interactions and communication with doctors about herbal medicines. Methods Qualitative, cross-sectional study, with purposive sampling which took place in Cheshire, UK. Eighteen in depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with female herbal medicine users aged 18 years and above. Results The large majority did not inform their GPs of their use of herbal medicines. This was due to lack of physician enquiry, perception of importance and fear of a negative response. Several women were not aware that herbal remedies could interact with prescribed or over the counter medicines. Of the women who had experienced adverse effects none had reported them, believing them of low importance. Conclusion The women had little knowledge about herb-drug interactions and rarely disclosed use of herbal medicines to their doctor. Doctors' communication and openness regarding herbal medicines needs to improve and there should be increased access to accurate information on herbal medicines in the public and health care domain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                15 March 2011
                01 March 2011
                : 104
                : 6
                : 927-933
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simplePrimary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston , Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
                [2 ]simpleArden Cancer Research Centre, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust , Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
                [3 ]simpleSection of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Cardiff University, Heath Park , Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                bjc201147
                10.1038/bjc.2011.47
                3065283
                21364591
                6640e4cc-82fc-4e46-9fd2-a5118b7c3496
                Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK
                History
                : 11 November 2010
                : 19 January 2011
                : 26 January 2011
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                survivorship,herbal medicines,prevalence
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                survivorship, herbal medicines, prevalence

                Comments

                Comment on this article