3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The results of tubal surgery in the treatment of infertility in two non-specialist hospitals

      , , , ,
      BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery

          From January 1978 to December 1983, 600 infertile women underwent microsurgery for tubal infertility. Only 257 women with the same extent of distal lesions on both sides or with unilateral occlusion (after contralateral salpingectomy) were considered. Patients were classified in four subgroups on the basis of the extent of occlusion. After fimbrioplasty for occlusion of degree I and salpingostomy for occlusion of degree II, the term pregnancy rate was more than 50%. After salpingostomy for occlusion of degrees III and IV, the term pregnancy rate was, respectively, 25% and 22%. The ectopic pregnancy rate was the highest (12%) after salpingostomy for occlusion of degree IV. After microsurgical salpingolysis, the term pregnancy rate reached 64%, whereas the ectopic pregnancy rate was as low as 2%. Ampullary dilatation, as determined by hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy, influences the postoperative pregnancy rate. Fimbrial microbiopsies were taken, and the ciliated cell percentage was obtained. Results suggest that the ciliation index is a valuable method of prognosis of tubal surgery. In conclusion, the pregnancy rate after distal surgery is related to the tubal morphologic findings: ampullary dilatation, fimbrial ciliated cell percentage, and tubal wall thickness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            MICROSURGICAL TUBOCORNUAL ANASTOMOSIS FOR REVERSAL OF STERILISATION

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery.

              A simple preoperative classification is described to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates following distal tubal microsurgery. Laser CO2 microsurgical salpingostomies were performed on 76 patients between January 1979 and January 1984. All of the patients underwent a preoperative assessment, which included hysterosalpingogram and laparoscopy, to formulate a preoperative classification based on a point system. The patients were divided into four groups according to tubal damage, with a subsequent intrauterine pregnancy rate of 58.3% in grade I, 36.6% in grade II, 9.5% in grade III, and 0% in grade IV. The patients were divided into four groups according to adhesions, with a subsequent intrauterine pregnancy rate of 38.8% with no adhesion, 32.0% with mild adhesions, 26.6% with moderate adhesions, and 5.5% with severe adhesions. From these results, a preoperative management is proposed for patients being considered for either distal tubal microsurgery or in vitro fertilization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
                BJOG:An international journal of O&G
                Wiley
                1470-0328
                1471-0528
                July 1990
                July 1990
                : 97
                : 7
                : 561-568
                Article
                10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02541.x
                65e82215-2c31-42f0-ad56-9f1bd11a8f73
                © 1990

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article