For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
Inviting an author to review:
Clinical complications in envenoming by <i>Apis</i> honeybee stings: insights into mechanisms, diagnosis, and pharmacological interventions
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
Article has an altmetric score of 4
21
references
 Top references
cited by
6
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      108
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Educator's blueprint: A how‐to guide for collecting validity evidence in survey‐ based research

      other
      Author(s): , MD, MEd 1 , , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD, PhD 1 , 4 , , PhD 5
      Publication date (Electronic):
      Journal: AEM Education and Training
      Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Surveys are descriptive assessment tools. Like other assessment tools, the validity and reliability of the data obtained from surveys depend, in large part, on the rigor of the development process. Without validity evidence, data from surveys may lack meaning, leading to uncertainty as to how well the survey truly measures the intended constructs. In documenting the evidence for the validity of survey results and their intended use, it is incumbent on the survey creator to have a firm understanding of validity frameworks. Having an understanding of validity evidence and how each step in the survey development process can support the validity argument makes it easier for the researcher to develop, implement, and publish a high‐quality survey.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores

          Michael Kane (2013)
          Article 0 comments Cited 333 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
          Article has an altmetric score of 28
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87

            Anthony R Artino, Jeffrey La Rochelle, Kent J DeZee … (2014)
            In this AMEE Guide, we consider the design and development of self-administered surveys, commonly called questionnaires. Questionnaires are widely employed in medical education research. Unfortunately, the processes used to develop such questionnaires vary in quality and lack consistent, rigorous standards. Consequently, the quality of the questionnaires used in medical education research is highly variable. To address this problem, this AMEE Guide presents a systematic, seven-step process for designing high-quality questionnaires, with particular emphasis on developing survey scales. These seven steps do not address all aspects of survey design, nor do they represent the only way to develop a high-quality questionnaire. Instead, these steps synthesize multiple survey design techniques and organize them into a cohesive process for questionnaire developers of all levels. Addressing each of these steps systematically will improve the probabilities that survey designers will accurately measure what they intend to measure.
            Article 0 comments Cited 297 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Article has an altmetric score of 88
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

              Frank J Floyd, Keith F. Widaman (1995)
              Article 0 comments Cited 243 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Article has an altmetric score of 7
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Jeffery Hill:
                ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-3022
                jeffery.hill@uc.edu
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): AEM Educ Train
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): AEM Educ Train
                Journal ID (doi): 10.1002/(ISSN)2472-5390
                Journal ID (publisher-id): AET2
                Title: AEM Education and Training
                Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                ISSN (Electronic): 2472-5390
                Publication date (Electronic): 20 December 2022
                Publication date Collection: December 2022
                Publication date PMC-release: 01 December 2022
                Volume: 6
                Issue: 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/aet2.v6.6 )
                Electronic Location Identifier: e10835
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Emergency Medicine George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Emergency Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond Virginia USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Health, Human Function, and Rehabilitation Sciences George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jeffery Hill, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267‐0769, USA.

                Email: jeffery.hill@ 123456uc.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-3022
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-0895
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8002
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-7853
                Article
                Publisher ID: AET210835 Other ID: AEMET-22-197.R1
                DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10835
                PMC ID: 9763973
                PubMed ID: 36545443
                SO-VID: 656113ed-3c8e-4e2e-9833-81b78c78fea9
                Copyright © © 2022 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
                License:

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Date revision received : 13 November 2022
                Date received : 19 August 2022
                Date accepted : 14 November 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 5, Words: 3323
                Categories
                Subject: Educator's Blueprint
                Subject: Educator's Blueprint
                Custom metadata
                source-schema-version-number 2.0
                cover-date December 2022
                details-of-publishers-convertor Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:20.12.2022

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content108

                See all similar

                Cited by6

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors211

                See all reference authors