5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      International Journal of COPD (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on pathophysiological processes underlying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) interventions, patient focused education, and self-management protocols. Sign up for email alerts here.

      39,063 Monthly downloads/views I 2.893 Impact Factor I 5.2 CiteScore I 1.16 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.804 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extrafine Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate vs Double Bronchodilation Therapy in Patients with COPD: A Historical Real-World Non-Inferiority Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of initiating extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) versus double bronchodilation (long-acting beta-agonists [LABA]/long-acting muscarinic antagonists [LAMA]) among patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations.

          Patients and Methods

          A historical cohort study was conducted using data from the UK’s Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Patients with COPD ≥40 years at diagnosis were included if they initiated extrafine BDP/FF or any LABA/LAMA double therapy as a step-up from no maintenance therapy or monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), LAMA, or LABA and a history of ≥2 moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous two years. The primary outcome was exacerbation rate from therapy initiation until a relevant therapy change or end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included rate of acute respiratory events, acute oral corticosteroids (OCS) courses, and antibiotic prescriptions with lower respiratory indication, modified Medical Research Council score (mMRC) ≥2, and time to first pneumonia diagnosis. The non-inferiority boundary was set at a relative difference of 15% on the ratio scale. Five potential treatment effect modifiers were investigated.

          Results

          A total of 1735 patients initiated extrafine BDP/FF and 2450 patients initiated LABA/LAMA. The mean age was 70 years, 51% were male, 41% current smokers, and 85% had FEV 1 <80% predicted. Extrafine BDP/FF showed non-inferiority to LABA/LAMA for rate of exacerbations (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.01 [95% CI 0.94–1.09]), acute respiratory events (IRR = 0.98 [0.92–1.04]), acute OCS courses (IRR = 1.01 [0.91–1.11]), and antibiotic prescriptions (IRR = 0.99 [0.90–1.09]), but not for mMRC (OR = 0.93 [0.69–1.27]) or risk of pneumonia (HR = 0.50 [0.14–1.73]). None of the a priori defined effect modifier candidates affected the comparative effectiveness.

          Conclusion

          This study found that stepping up to extrafine BDP/FF from no maintenance or monotherapy was not inferior to stepping up to double bronchodilation therapy in patients with a history of exacerbations.

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD

            The benefits of triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with an inhaled glucocorticoid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), as compared with dual therapy (either inhaled glucocorticoid-LABA or LAMA-LABA), are uncertain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of exacerbation risk and response to budesonide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a post-hoc analysis of three randomised trials.

              The peripheral blood eosinophil count might help identify those patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who will experience fewer exacerbations when taking inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Previous post-hoc analyses have proposed eosinophil cutoffs that are both arbitrary and limited in evaluating complex interactions of treatment response. We modelled eosinophil count as a continuous variable to determine the characteristics that determine both exacerbation risk and clinical response to ICS in patients with COPD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
                Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
                copd
                copd
                International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Dove
                1176-9106
                1178-2005
                29 October 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 2739-2750
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd , Singapore, Singapore
                [2 ]Data to Insights Research Solutions , Lisbon, Portugal
                [3 ]Department of Global Clinical Development, Chiesi SAS , Bois Colombes Cedex, France
                [4 ]Department of Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A , Parma, Italy
                [5 ]Mescio Research , Blauwestad, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara , Ferrara, Italy
                [7 ]Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Respiratory Diseases Unit, University Hospital Virgen Del Rocío , Seville, Spain
                [9 ]Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Centre-Université de Paris , Paris, France
                [10 ]University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester, UK
                [11 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Marburg, Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL) , Marburg, Germany
                [12 ]Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence: David B Price Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences University of Aberdeen , Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD198785, UKTel +65 6962 3627 Email dprice@opri.sg
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-1865
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-6730
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-1061
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-5809
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8894-1689
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7705-7927
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-1367
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-5033
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-9992
                Article
                269287
                10.2147/COPD.S269287
                7605609
                33149571
                64bad17d-3a24-4bd7-9bc8-b5f09b49d860
                © 2020 Voorham et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 01 July 2020
                : 07 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 7, References: 29, Pages: 12
                Categories
                Original Research

                Respiratory medicine
                real-world,electronic health records,observational,comparative effectiveness,heterogeneity,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article