28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      SNX-1 and RME-8 oppose the assembly of HGRS-1/ESCRT-0 degradative microdomains on endosomes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Endosomes are membrane-bound organelles that are important for nutrient uptake, protein and lipid sorting, and signal transduction. When integral membrane proteins have reached the endosomal system, they can be sent to the lysosome for degradation or recycled for reuse. Here we provide insight into how the machinery important for reuse controls the machinery that mediates degradation. We show that these opposing functions occupy physically distinct regions of the endosomes, termed microdomains, and that this separation is likely to provide a physical framework for a variety of sorting decisions.

          Abstract

          After endocytosis, transmembrane cargo reaches endosomes, where it encounters complexes dedicated to opposing functions: recycling and degradation. Microdomains containing endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT)-0 component Hrs [hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (HGRS-1) in Caenorhabditis elegans] mediate cargo degradation, concentrating ubiquitinated cargo and organizing the activities of ESCRT. At the same time, retromer associated sorting nexin one (SNX-1) and its binding partner, J-domain protein RME-8, sort cargo away from degradation, promoting cargo recycling to the Golgi. Thus, we hypothesized that there could be important regulatory interactions between retromer and ESCRT that balance degradative and recycling functions. Taking advantage of the naturally large endosomes of the C. elegans coelomocyte, we visualized complementary ESCRT-0 and RME-8/SNX-1 microdomains in vivo and assayed the ability of retromer and ESCRT microdomains to regulate one another. We found in snx -1( 0) and rme-8( ts) mutants increased endosomal coverage and intensity of HGRS-1–labeled microdomains, as well as increased total levels of HGRS-1 bound to membranes. These effects are specific to SNX-1 and RME-8, as loss of other retromer components SNX-3 and vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 35 (VPS-35) did not affect HGRS-1 microdomains. Additionally, knockdown of hgrs-1 had little to no effect on SNX-1 and RME-8 microdomains, suggesting directionality to the interaction. Separation of the functionally distinct ESCRT-0 and SNX-1/RME-8 microdomains was also compromised in the absence of RME-8 and SNX-1, a phenomenon we observed to be conserved, as depletion of Snx1 and Snx2 in HeLa cells also led to greater overlap of Rme-8 and Hrs on endosomes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
          Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
          pnas
          pnas
          PNAS
          Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
          National Academy of Sciences
          0027-8424
          1091-6490
          17 January 2017
          4 January 2017
          : 114
          : 3
          : E307-E316
          Affiliations
          [1] aDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University , Piscataway, NJ 08854;
          [2] bDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Piscataway, NJ 08854;
          [3] cDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, W. M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University , Piscataway, NJ 08854
          Author notes
          2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: grant@ 123456biology.rutgers.edu .

          Edited by Peter S. McPherson, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Pietro De Camilli December 2, 2016 (received for review August 1, 2016)

          Author contributions: A.N., Q.C., and B.D.G. designed research; A.N., P.T., S.W., J.G., and K.Y.K. performed research; A.N., J.G., and A.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.N., P.T., S.W., K.Y.K., Q.C., and B.D.G. analyzed data; and A.N. and B.D.G. wrote the paper.

          1S.W., J.G., and A.M. contributed equally to this work.

          Article
          PMC5255583 PMC5255583 5255583 201612730
          10.1073/pnas.1612730114
          5255583
          28053230
          64a2d140-f918-4f90-9be3-bdba0df73dec
          History
          Page count
          Pages: 10
          Funding
          Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 100000057
          Award ID: GM067237
          Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 100000057
          Award ID: GM103995
          Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 100000057
          Award ID: 5F32GM096599
          Categories
          PNAS Plus
          Biological Sciences
          Cell Biology
          PNAS Plus

          SNX-1,endosome,clathrin,Hrs,RME-8
          SNX-1, endosome, clathrin, Hrs, RME-8

          Comments

          Comment on this article