37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Agave as a model CAM crop system for a warming and drying world

      review-article
      Frontiers in Plant Science
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      Agave, agriculture, bioenergy, CAM, century plant, stress physiology, succulent

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As climate change leads to drier and warmer conditions in semi-arid regions, growing resource-intensive C 3 and C 4 crops will become more challenging. Such crops will be subjected to increased frequency and intensity of drought and heat stress. However, agaves, even more than pineapple ( Ananas comosus) and prickly pear ( Opuntia ficus-indica and related species), typify highly productive plants that will respond favorably to global warming, both in natural and cultivated settings. With nearly 200 species spread throughout the U.S., Mexico, and Central America, agaves have evolved traits, including crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), that allow them to survive extreme heat and drought. Agaves have been used as sources of food, beverage, and fiber by societies for hundreds of years. The varied uses of Agave, combined with its unique adaptations to environmental stress, warrant its consideration as a model CAM crop. Besides the damaging cycles of surplus and shortage that have long beset the tequila industry, the relatively long maturation cycle of Agave, its monocarpic flowering habit, and unique morphology comprise the biggest barriers to its widespread use as a crop suitable for mechanized production. Despite these challenges, agaves exhibit potential as crops since they can be grown on marginal lands, but with more resource input than is widely assumed. If these constraints can be reconciled, Agave shows considerable promise as an alternative source for food, alternative sweeteners, and even bioenergy. And despite the many unknowns regarding agaves, they provide a means to resolve disparities in resource availability and needs between natural and human systems in semi-arid regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references204

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth.

          The future adequacy of freshwater resources is difficult to assess, owing to a complex and rapidly changing geography of water supply and use. Numerical experiments combining climate model outputs, water budgets, and socioeconomic information along digitized river networks demonstrate that (i) a large proportion of the world's population is currently experiencing water stress and (ii) rising water demands greatly outweigh greenhouse warming in defining the state of global water systems to 2025. Consideration of direct human impacts on global water supply remains a poorly articulated but potentially important facet of the larger global change question.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels.

              Negative environmental consequences of fossil fuels and concerns about petroleum supplies have spurred the search for renewable transportation biofuels. To be a viable alternative, a biofuel should provide a net energy gain, have environmental benefits, be economically competitive, and be producible in large quantities without reducing food supplies. We use these criteria to evaluate, through life-cycle accounting, ethanol from corn grain and biodiesel from soybeans. Ethanol yields 25% more energy than the energy invested in its production, whereas biodiesel yields 93% more. Compared with ethanol, biodiesel releases just 1.0%, 8.3%, and 13% of the agricultural nitrogen, phosphorus, and pesticide pollutants, respectively, per net energy gain. Relative to the fossil fuels they displace, greenhouse gas emissions are reduced 12% by the production and combustion of ethanol and 41% by biodiesel. Biodiesel also releases less air pollutants per net energy gain than ethanol. These advantages of biodiesel over ethanol come from lower agricultural inputs and more efficient conversion of feedstocks to fuel. Neither biofuel can replace much petroleum without impacting food supplies. Even dedicating all U.S. corn and soybean production to biofuels would meet only 12% of gasoline demand and 6% of diesel demand. Until recent increases in petroleum prices, high production costs made biofuels unprofitable without subsidies. Biodiesel provides sufficient environmental advantages to merit subsidy. Transportation biofuels such as synfuel hydrocarbons or cellulosic ethanol, if produced from low-input biomass grown on agriculturally marginal land or from waste biomass, could provide much greater supplies and environmental benefits than food-based biofuels.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                24 September 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 684
                Affiliations
                Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University Provo, UT, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Edmundo Acevedo, University of California, Davis, USA

                Reviewed by: Nicolas Franck, Universidad de Chile, Chile; Victor Garcia De Cortazar, Universidad de Chile, Chile

                *Correspondence: J. Ryan Stewart, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 4105 Life Sciences Building, Provo, UT 84602, USA rstewart@ 123456byu.edu

                This article was submitted to Crop Science and Horticulture, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2015.00684
                4585221
                26442005
                647bccc3-a5a6-445d-8134-5717bc83f629
                Copyright © 2015 Stewart.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 May 2015
                : 17 August 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 305, Pages: 20, Words: 20976
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Review

                Plant science & Botany
                agave,agriculture,bioenergy,cam,century plant,stress physiology,succulent
                Plant science & Botany
                agave, agriculture, bioenergy, cam, century plant, stress physiology, succulent

                Comments

                Comment on this article