Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The impact on pregnancy outcomes of late‐onset gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the third trimester: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Evidence is inconsistent regarding the impact of late gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on perinatal outcomes.

          Objectives

          To evaluate associations of GDM diagnosed in the third trimester (late GDM) with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

          Search Strategy

          We searched Embase, Medline, and Web of Science from January 1, 1990 to June 16, 2022, for observational studies.

          Selection Criteria

          Late GDM was defined as a de novo diagnosis, i.e. after a negative screening for diabetes in the second trimester, and at later than 28 weeks of pregnancy.

          Data Collection and Analysis

          Each abstract and full‐text article was independently reviewed by the same two authors. Quality was assessed with the use of the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model.

          Main Results

          Twelve studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria, including 3103 patients (571 with late GDM and 3103 controls). Incidences of shoulder dystocia (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02–2.42, P = 0.040), 5‐minute Apgar score <7 (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.14–2.86, P = 0.024), cesarean delivery (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.51–2.60, P < 0.001), and emergent cesarean delivery (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02–2.40, P = 0.040) were significantly higher among women with late GDM than among the controls. The groups showed similarity in the rates of fetal macrosomia, large‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses, neonatal hypoglycemia, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

          Conclusions

          This meta‐analysis showed associations of late GDM with increased adverse perinatal outcomes. Prospective studies should evaluate the impact on perinatal outcomes of repeated third‐trimester screening for late GDM.

          Synopsis

          Late gestational diabetes mellitus, diagnosed after 32 weeks, was associated with higher incidence of shoulder dystocia, 5‐minute Apgar score <7 and cesarean delivery.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
          Intl J Gynecology & Obste
          Wiley
          0020-7292
          1879-3479
          November 21 2023
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Galilee Medical Center Nahariya Israel
          [2 ] Azrieli Faculty of Medicine Bar Ilan University Safed Israel
          [3 ] Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA
          [4 ] BCNatal, Barcelona Center for Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona and Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona, and Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases Barcelona Spain
          Article
          10.1002/ijgo.15254
          37987501
          647832c8-22ca-459b-b3ac-94480669d103
          © 2023

          http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content146

          Cited by2