21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Advances in medicine have helped many to live longer lives and to be able to meet health challenges. However death rates are anticipated to increase given the ageing population and chronic disease progression. Being able to talk about death is seen to be important in normalising death as part of life and supporting preparedness for death. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provide opportunities for the community to engage in collaborative learning. A 5 week MOOC was developed covering four main topics (language and humour, representations of death, medicalisation of dying, and digital dying) aiming:

          • To enable participants to openly and supportively discuss and learn about issues around living, death and dying,

          • To explore the normally unheard opinions and views of Australians around death and dying, and

          • To determine what effect online learning and discussions offered through the MOOC had on participants’ feelings and attitudes towards death and dying.

          Methods

          Data was captured on engagement rates in the various MOOC activities. Death Attitudes were measured by five items representing the MOOC’s learning objectives and completed at enrolment and conclusion. MOOC Satisfaction was measured with six items at the end of the MOOC. Descriptive statistics were produced for each variable and Chi-Square Tests of Independence assessed the extent of the relationship between categorical variables. Socio-demographic variables were examined as predictors of the outcome variables of MOOC engagement, MOOC satisfaction, and death attitudes. Ethical approval was received from Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (Project No. 7247).

          Results

          One thousand one hundred fifty six people enrolled in the Dying2Learn MOOC with 895 participating in some way. Enrolees were primarily female (92.1%). Age ranged from 16 to 84 ( mean = 49.5, SD = 12.3). MOOC satisfaction scores were high. Responses to the experience of participating in the MOOC were very positive, with mean scores ranging from 4.3 to 4.6 (aligning with agreement and strong agreement to statements on the value of participating). Death Attitudes were positive at commencement but increased significantly following participation.

          Conclusions

          The Dying2Learn MOOC provided an environment that enabled open and supportive discussion around death and dying and influenced attitudinal change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Advance care planning for cancer patients: a systematic review of perceptions and experiences of patients, families, and healthcare providers.

            Patients with advanced cancer may benefit from end of life (EOL) planning, but there is evidence that their willingness and desire to engage in advance care planning (ACP) varies. The reasons for this remain poorly understood. Previous reviews on ACP most commonly report outcome measures related to medical interventions and type of care. Synthesis of the literature, which aims to illuminate the salient characteristics of ACP and investigates the psychological and social features of preparation for the EOL, is required.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Health literacy among different age groups in Germany: results of a cross-sectional survey

              Background Health literacy is of increasing importance in public health research. It is a necessary pre-condition for the involvement in decisions about health and health care and related to health outcomes. Knowledge about limited health literacy in different age groups is crucial to better target public health interventions for subgroups of the population. However, little is known about health literacy in Germany. The study therefore assesses the prevalence of limited health literacy and associated factors among different age groups. Methods The Health Literacy Survey Germany is a cross-sectional study with 2,000 participants aged 15 years or older in private households. Perceived health literacy was assessed via computer-assisted personal interviews using the HLS-EU-Q-47 questionnaire. Descriptive analyses, chi-square tests and odds ratios were performed stratified for different age groups. Results The population affected by limited perceived health literacy increases by age. Of the respondents aged 15–29 years, 47.3 % had limited perceived health literacy and 47.2 % of those aged 30–45 years, whereas 55.2 % of the respondents aged 46–64 years and 66.4 % aged 65 years and older showed limited perceived health literacy. In all age groups, limited perceived health literacy was associated with limited functional health literacy, low social status, and a high frequency of doctor visits. Conclusions The results suggest a need to further investigate perceived health literacy in all phases of the life-course. Particular attention should be devoted to persons with lower social status, limited functional health literacy and/or a high number of doctor visits in all age groups.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jennifer.tieman@flinders.edu.au
                lauren.miller@flinders.edu.au
                deborah.rawlings@flinders.edu.au
                deborah.parker@uts.edu.au
                christinersanderson@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliative Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-684X
                20 February 2018
                20 February 2018
                2018
                : 17
                : 31
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0367 2697, GRID grid.1014.4, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, , Flinders University, ; GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001 Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7611, GRID grid.117476.2, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, ; Level 7, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-1900
                Article
                287
                10.1186/s12904-018-0287-3
                5819292
                29458347
                64652385-620b-4be4-85e8-b37bce1a6dc9
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 May 2017
                : 9 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003921, Department of Health, Australian Government;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                death attitudes,palliative care,community education,online learning,mooc

                Comments

                Comment on this article