11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The role of neuro‐immune interactions in cancer‐related fatigue: Biobehavioral risk factors and mechanisms

      1
      Cancer
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fatigue is a common and distressing symptom in cancer patients and survivors. There is substantial variability in the severity and persistence of cancer-related fatigue that may be driven by individual differences in host factors, including characteristics that predate the cancer experience as well as responses to cancer and its treatment. This review examines biobehavioral risk factors linked to fatigue and the mechanisms through which they influence fatigue across the cancer continuum, with a focus on neuro-immune processes. Among psychosocial risk factors, childhood adversity is a strong and consistent predictor of cancer-related fatigue; other risk factors include history of depression, catastrophizing, lack of physical activity, and sleep disturbance, with compelling preliminary evidence for loneliness and trait anxiety. Among biological systems, initial work suggests that alterations in immune, neuroendocrine, and neural processes are associated with fatigue, though research is sparse. Identification of key risk factors and underlying mechanisms is critical for the development and deployment of targeted interventions to reduce the burden of fatigue in the growing population of cancer survivors. Given the multidimensional nature of fatigue, interventions that influence multiple systems may be most effective. Neuro-immune processes play a critical role in cancer-related fatigue. This review examines biobehavioral risk factors and mechanisms for fatigue with a focus on psychological, neural, neuroendocrine, and immune processes and considers implications for treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation

          Social isolation has been recognized as a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in humans for more than a quarter of a century. Although the focus of research has been on objective social roles and health behavior, the brain is the key organ for forming, monitoring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing salutary connections with others. Accordingly, population-based longitudinal research indicates that perceived social isolation (loneliness) is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality independent of objective social isolation and health behavior. Human and animal investigations of neuroendocrine stress mechanisms that may be involved suggest that (a) chronic social isolation increases the activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical axis, and (b) these effects are more dependent on the disruption of a social bond between a significant pair than objective isolation per se. The relational factors and neuroendocrine, neurobiological, and genetic mechanisms that may contribute to the association between perceived isolation and mortality are reviewed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reciprocal regulation of the neural and innate immune systems.

            Innate immune responses are regulated by microorganisms and cell death, as well as by a third class of stress signal from the nervous and endocrine systems. The innate immune system also feeds back, through the production of cytokines, to regulate the function of the central nervous system (CNS), and this has effects on behaviour. These signals provide an extrinsic regulatory circuit that links physiological, social and environmental conditions, as perceived by the CNS, with transcriptional 'decision-making' in leukocytes. CNS-mediated regulation of innate immune responses optimizes total organism fitness and provides new opportunities for therapeutic control of chronic infectious, inflammatory and neuropsychiatric diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Resilience to loss and potential trauma.

              Initial research on loss and potentially traumatic events (PTEs) has been dominated by either a psychopathological approach emphasizing individual dysfunction or an event approach emphasizing average differences between exposed and nonexposed groups. We consider the limitations of these approaches and review more recent research that has focused on the heterogeneity of outcomes following aversive events. Using both traditional analytic tools and sophisticated latent trajectory modeling, this research has identified a set of prototypical outcome patterns. Typically, the most common outcome following PTEs is a stable trajectory of healthy functioning or resilience. We review research showing that resilience is not the result of a few dominant factors, but rather that there are multiple independent predictors of resilient outcomes. Finally, we critically evaluate the question of whether resilience-building interventions can actually make people more resilient, and we close with suggestions for future research on resilience. © 2011 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancer
                Cancer
                Wiley
                0008-543X
                1097-0142
                December 06 2018
                February 2019
                January 02 2019
                February 2019
                : 125
                : 3
                : 353-364
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California Los Angeles California
                Article
                10.1002/cncr.31790
                6502236
                30602059
                6459dded-36d0-4956-bcb8-44f278667ca7
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article