Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Host–Endosymbiont Genome Integration in a Deep-Sea Chemosymbiotic Clam

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Endosymbiosis with chemosynthetic bacteria has enabled many deep-sea invertebrates to thrive at hydrothermal vents and cold seeps, but most previous studies on this mutualism have focused on the bacteria only. Vesicomyid clams dominate global deep-sea chemosynthesis-based ecosystems. They differ from most deep-sea symbiotic animals in passing their symbionts from parent to offspring, enabling intricate coevolution between the host and the symbiont. Here, we sequenced the genomes of the clam Archivesica marissinica (Bivalvia: Vesicomyidae) and its bacterial symbiont to understand the genomic/metabolic integration behind this symbiosis. At 1.52 Gb, the clam genome encodes 28 genes horizontally transferred from bacteria, a large number of pseudogenes and transposable elements whose massive expansion corresponded to the timing of the rise and subsequent divergence of symbiont-bearing vesicomyids. The genome exhibits gene family expansion in cellular processes that likely facilitate chemoautotrophy, including gas delivery to support energy and carbon production, metabolite exchange with the symbiont, and regulation of the bacteriocyte population. Contraction in cellulase genes is likely adaptive to the shift from phytoplankton-derived to bacteria-based food. It also shows contraction in bacterial recognition gene families, indicative of suppressed immune response to the endosymbiont. The gammaproteobacterium endosymbiont has a reduced genome of 1.03 Mb but retains complete pathways for sulfur oxidation, carbon fixation, and biosynthesis of 20 common amino acids, indicating the host’s high dependence on the symbiont for nutrition. Overall, the host–symbiont genomes show not only tight metabolic complementarity but also distinct signatures of coevolution allowing the vesicomyids to thrive in chemosynthesis-based ecosystems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

          Genomics has revolutionized biological research, but quality assessment of the resulting assembled sequences is complicated and remains mostly limited to technical measures like N50.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

            Some simple formulae were obtained which enable us to estimate evolutionary distances in terms of the number of nucleotide substitutions (and, also, the evolutionary rates when the divergence times are known). In comparing a pair of nucleotide sequences, we distinguish two types of differences; if homologous sites are occupied by different nucleotide bases but both are purines or both pyrimidines, the difference is called type I (or "transition" type), while, if one of the two is a purine and the other is a pyrimidine, the difference is called type II (or "transversion" type). Letting P and Q be respectively the fractions of nucleotide sites showing type I and type II differences between two sequences compared, then the evolutionary distance per site is K = -(1/2) ln [(1-2P-Q) square root of 1-2Q]. The evolutionary rate per year is then given by k = K/(2T), where T is the time since the divergence of the two sequences. If only the third codon positions are compared, the synonymous component of the evolutionary base substitutions per site is estimated by K'S = -(1/2) ln (1-2P-Q). Also, formulae for standard errors were obtained. Some examples were worked out using reported globin sequences to show that synonymous substitutions occur at much higher rates than amino acid-altering substitutions in evolution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype.

              Lancelets ('amphioxus') are the modern survivors of an ancient chordate lineage, with a fossil record dating back to the Cambrian period. Here we describe the structure and gene content of the highly polymorphic approximately 520-megabase genome of the Florida lancelet Branchiostoma floridae, and analyse it in the context of chordate evolution. Whole-genome comparisons illuminate the murky relationships among the three chordate groups (tunicates, lancelets and vertebrates), and allow not only reconstruction of the gene complement of the last common chordate ancestor but also partial reconstruction of its genomic organization, as well as a description of two genome-wide duplications and subsequent reorganizations in the vertebrate lineage. These genome-scale events shaped the vertebrate genome and provided additional genetic variation for exploitation during vertebrate evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Associate Editor
                Journal
                Mol Biol Evol
                Mol Biol Evol
                molbev
                Molecular Biology and Evolution
                Oxford University Press
                0737-4038
                1537-1719
                February 2021
                21 September 2020
                21 September 2020
                : 38
                : 2
                : 502-518
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University , Hong Kong, China
                [2 ] HKBU Institute of Research and Continuing Education, Virtual University Park , Shenzhen, China
                [3 ] Hong Kong Branch of the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , Hong Kong, China
                [4 ] Division of Life Science, Department of Ocean Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , Hong Kong, China
                [5 ] Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, China
                [6 ] X-STAR, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) , Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
                [7 ] Sanya Institute of Deep-Sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science , Sanya, Hainan, China
                [8 ] MLR Key Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, China Geological Survey , Guangzhou, China
                [9 ] State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University , Hong Kong, China
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: E-mail: qiujw@ 123456hkbu.edu.hk .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8002-6881
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-4021
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1541-9627
                Article
                msaa241
                10.1093/molbev/msaa241
                7826175
                32956455
                64216a1c-de43-453f-855b-63aca21e7b5e
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: National Key R&D Program, Ministry of Science and Technology;
                Award ID: 2018YFC0310005
                Funded by: Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory;
                Award ID: GML2019ZD0409
                Award ID: L20190005
                Award ID: GML2019ZD0404
                Funded by: University Grants Committee of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region;
                Award ID: 12302917
                Funded by: State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University;
                Award ID: SKLP_1920_P04
                Categories
                Discoveries
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01130
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01180

                Molecular biology
                cold seep,genome assembly,genome erosion,hydrothermal vent,mollusca,symbiosis
                Molecular biology
                cold seep, genome assembly, genome erosion, hydrothermal vent, mollusca, symbiosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content684

                Cited by36

                Most referenced authors2,559