Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast material in digital vascular imaging and selective renal arteriography.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We assessed the nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic radiocontrast material (CM) in two groups of patients in a prospective study. One group of 25 potential live kidney donors was studied following conventional renal angiography, carried out as part of the routine pre-operative assessment. The other group of 49 renal transplant patients with varying degrees of renal impairment was studied following digital vascular imaging carried out for investigation of hypertension. Plasma creatine, urinary N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), urinary microglobulin (B2M) and urinary protein excretion were measured before and after the imaging procedure. There were no significant changes in these parameters following digital vascular imaging, but there were increases in plasma creatinine (p less than 0.005) and urinary NAG creatinine ratio (p less than 0.002) in the conventional angiography group following the procedure. Substantial proteinuria developed in 35% of patients following conventional angiography. The differences in nephrotoxicity of radiocontrast agents during the two procedures could not be accounted for by the dose of material used, but probably reflect the effect of differences in the route of administration on the maximal concentration of the material reaching the kidney. Non-ionic radiocontrast material proved less toxic than ionic and may be preferable in conventional angiography.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Br J Radiol
          The British journal of radiology
          British Institute of Radiology
          0007-1285
          0007-1285
          Sep 1983
          : 56
          : 669
          Article
          10.1259/0007-1285-56-669-631
          6349742
          63b07608-9b4c-4daf-bab7-6cb470ce5acf
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article