3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk management practices in Egypt: A comparison study between Islamic and Conventional banks

      Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions
      Virtus Interpress

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this research is to examine the degree to which the Egyptian banks use risk management practices and techniques to eliminate associated risks to their business. Not only has that but also to compare between Islamic and conventional banked in terms of risk management practices. A standardized questionnaire was used to cover the main aspects of risk management: understanding risk, risk management, risk identification, risk assessment and analysis; risk monitoring and risk management practices and finally the types of risks faced by the two set of banks. The study found that the most challenging types of risks facing Islamic and conventional banks in Egypt are credit and liquidity risks. Conventional banks are more efficient in risk management and use more sophisticated techniques and practices. Liquidity risk is the most prominent and vital risk for Islamic Banks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          THE EFFECTS OF THE GLOBAL CRISIS ON ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

          This paper examines the performance of Islamic banks (IBs) and conventional banks (CBs) during the recent global crisis by examining the impact of the crisis on profitability, credit and asset growth, and external ratings in a group of countries where the two types of banks have significant market share. Our analysis suggests that IBs have been affected differently than CBs. Factors related to IBs' business model helped limit the adverse impact on profitability in 2008, while weaknesses in risk management practices in some IBs led to a larger decline in profitability in 2009 compared to CBs. IBs' credit and asset growth performed better than did that of CBs in 2008–2009, contributing to financial and economic stability. External rating agencies' re-assessment of IBs' risk was generally more favorable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Risk management practices of conventional and Islamic banks in Bahrain

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Banks' risk management: a comparison study of UAE national and foreign banks

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions
                RGC
                Virtus Interpress
                20774303
                2077429X
                2015
                2015
                2015
                2015
                : 5
                : 4
                : 257-270
                Article
                10.22495/rgcv5i4c2art1
                63840a11-a59c-4346-9f19-5e43ec35d7e3
                © 2015

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article