6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      International consensus criteria for diagnosing and staging hand–arm vibration syndrome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          In the 30 years since the Stockholm Workshop Scale (SWS) was published, the scientific literature on hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) has grown and experience has been gained in its practical application. This research was undertaken to develop an up-to-date evidence-based classification for HAVS by seeking consensus between experts in the field.

          Methods

          Seven occupational physicians who are clinically active and have had work published on HAVS in the last 10 years were asked to independently take part in a three-round iterative Delphi process. Consensus was taken when 5/7 (72%) agreed with a particular statement. Experts were asked to provide evidence from the literature or data from their own research to support their views.

          Results

          Consensus was achieved for most of the questions that were used to develop an updated staging system for HAVS. The vascular and neurological components from the SWS are retained, but ambiguous descriptors and tests without adequately developed methodology such as tactile discrimination, or discriminating power such as grip strength, are not included in the new staging system. A blanching score taken from photographs of the hands during vasospastic episodes is recommended in place of self-recall and frequency of attacks to stage vascular HAVS. Methods with the best evidence base are described for assessing sensory perception and dexterity.

          Conclusions

          A new classification has been developed with three stages for the clinical classification of vascular and neurological HAVS based on international consensus. We recommend it replaces the SWS for clinical and research purposes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International consensus criteria for the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon.

          Vasoconstriction accompanied by changes in skin color is a normal physiologic response to cold. The distinction between this normal physiology and Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has yet to be well characterized. In anticipation of the 9th International Congress on Autoimmunity, a panel of 12 RP experts from 9 different institutes and four different countries were assembled for a Delphi exercise to establish new diagnostic criteria for RP. Relevant investigators with highly cited manuscripts in Raynaud's-related research were identified using the Web of Science and invited to participate. Surveys at each stage were administered to participants via the on-line SurveyMonkey software tool. The participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of statements using a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) through 9 (extremely appropriate). In the second stage, panel participants were asked to rank rewritten items from the first round that were scored as "uncertain" for the diagnosis of RP, items with significant disagreement (Disagreement Index > 1), and new items suggested by the panel. Results were analyzed using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry (IPRAS) method. A 3-Step Approach to diagnose RP was then developed using items the panelists "agreed" were "appropriate" diagnostic criteria. In the final stage, the panel was presented with the newly developed diagnostic criteria and asked to rate them against previous models. Following the first two iterations of the Delphi exercise, the panel of 12 experts agreed that 36 of the items were "appropriate", 12 items had "uncertain" appropriateness, and 13 items were "inappropriate" to use in the diagnostic criteria of RP. Using an expert committee, we developed a 3-Step Approach for the diagnosis of RP and 5 additional criteria for the diagnosis of primary RP. The committee came to an agreement that the proposed criteria were "appropriate and accurate" for use by physicians to diagnose patients with RP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Hand-arm vibration and the risk of vascular and neurological diseases—A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background Increased occurrence of Raynaud’s phenomenon, neurosensory injury and carpal tunnel syndrome has been reported for more than 100 years in association with work with vibrating machines. The current risk prediction modelling (ISO-5349) for “Raynaud’s phenomenon” is based on a few studies published 70 to 40 years ago. There are no corresponding risk prediction models for neurosensory injury or carpal tunnel syndrome, nor any systematic reviews comprising a statistical synthesis (meta-analysis) of the evidence. Objectives Our aim was to provide a systematic review of the literature on the association between Raynaud’s phenomenon, neurosensory injuries and carpal tunnel syndrome and hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure. Moreover the aim was to estimate the magnitude of such an association using meta-analysis. Methods This systematic review covers the scientific literature up to January 2016. The databases used for the literature search were PubMed and Science Direct. We found a total of 4,335 abstracts, which were read and whose validity was assessed according to pre-established criteria. 294 articles were examined in their entirety to determine whether each article met the inclusion criteria. The possible risk of bias was assessed for each article. 52 articles finally met the pre-established criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Results The results show that workers who are exposed to HAV have an increased risk of vascular and neurological diseases compared to non-vibration exposed groups. The crude estimate of the risk increase is approximately 4–5 fold. The estimated effect size (odds ratio) is 6.9 for the studies of Raynaud’s phenomenon when including only the studies judged to have a low risk of bias. The corresponding risk of neurosensory injury is 7.4 and the equivalent of carpal tunnel syndrome is 2.9. Conclusion At equal exposures, neurosensory injury occurs with a 3-time factor shorter latency than Raynaud’s phenomenon. Which is why preventive measures should address this vibration health hazard with greater attention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The two-point discrimination test--time for a re-appraisal?

              The two-point discrimination (2PD) test is the most frequently used test for the assessment of the sensory outcome after nerve repair. Here we focus on factors which explain the enormous and implausible variability in reported 2PD levels after nerve repair. We conclude that the 2PD testing technique is not at all standardized and that its use as the sole test for tactile gnosis recovery should be seriously questioned. Reports of 2PD results should always be accompanied by a detailed description of how the test was performed, especially with reference to the pressure applied and the testing protocol.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                020 3028 1888 , jon.poole@hse.gov.uk
                Journal
                Int Arch Occup Environ Health
                Int Arch Occup Environ Health
                International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-0131
                1432-1246
                27 September 2018
                27 September 2018
                2019
                : 92
                : 1
                : 117-127
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1769 7123, GRID grid.420622.0, Centre for Workplace Health, , HSE’s Health and Safety Laboratory, ; Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1941 4308, GRID grid.5133.4, Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, , University of Trieste, ; Trieste, Italy
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, , Umea University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000403961069, GRID grid.1121.3, Rolls-Royce, ; P O Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.415502.7, Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, , St Michael’s Hospital and University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, GRID grid.17091.3e, Department of Medicine, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, BC Canada
                Article
                1359
                10.1007/s00420-018-1359-7
                6323073
                30264331
                6363ed3d-f86c-46f1-ac18-6382c09bc15d
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 11 April 2018
                : 17 September 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Health and Safety Executive, GB
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

                Occupational & Environmental medicine
                havs,stockholm workshop scale,delphi method,health surveillance

                Comments

                Comment on this article