91
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Phase I/II trial to Investigate Preoperative Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) in patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: interim analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To report an unplanned interim analysis of a prospective, one-armed, single center phase I/II trial (NCT01566123).

          Methods

          Between 2007 and 2013, 27 patients (pts) with primary/recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas (size > 5 cm, M0, at least marginally resectable) were enrolled. The protocol attempted neoadjuvant IMRT using an integrated boost with doses of 45–50 Gy to PTV and 50–56 Gy to GTV in 25 fractions, followed by surgery and IOERT (10–12 Gy). Primary endpoint was 5-year-LC, secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, resectability, and acute/late toxicity. The majority of patients showed high grade lesions (FNCLCC G1:18%, G2:52%, G3:30%), predominantly liposarcomas (70%). Median tumor size was 15 cm (6–31).

          Results

          Median follow-up was 33 months (5–75). Neoadjuvant IMRT was performed as planned (median dose 50 Gy, 26–55) in all except 2 pts (93%). Gross total resection was feasible in all except one patient. Final margin status was R0 in 6 (22%) and R1 in 20 pts (74%). Contiguous-organ resection was needed in all grossly resected patients. IOERT was performed in 23 pts (85%) with a median dose of 12 Gy (10–20 Gy).

          We observed 7 local recurrences, transferring into estimated 3- and 5-year-LC rates of 72%. Two were located outside the EBRT area and two were observed after more than 5 years. Locally recurrent situation had a significantly negative impact on local control. Distant failure was found in 8 pts, resulting in 3- and 5-year-DC rates of 63%. Patients with leiomyosarcoma had a significantly increased risk of distant failure. Estimated 3- and 5-year-rates were 40% for PFS and 74% for OS. Severe acute toxicity (grade 3) was present in 4 pts (15%). Severe postoperative complications were found in 9 pts (33%), of whom 2 finally died after multiple re-interventions. Severe late toxicity (grade 3) was scored in 6% of surviving patients after 1 year and none after 2 years.

          Conclusion

          Combination of neoadjuvant IMRT, surgery and IOERT is feasible with acceptable toxicity and yields good results in terms of LC and OS in patients with high-risk retroperitoneal sarcomas. Long term follow-up seems mandatory given the observation of late recurrences. Accrual of patients will be continued with extended follow-up.

          Trial registration

          NCT01566123.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution.

          To analyze treatment and survival of a large cohort of patients with retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) treated and prospectively followed at a single institution. Retroperitoneal STS are relatively uncommon and constitute a difficult management problem. Although surgical resection is often difficult or impossible, current chemotherapy is not effective and radiation is limited by toxicity to adjacent structures. Thus, complete surgical resection remains the most effective modality for selected primary and recurrent disease. Five hundred patients with retroperitoneal STS were admitted and treated between July 1, 1982, and September 30, 1997, and prospectively followed. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were analyzed for disease-specific and disease-free survival. Survival was determined with the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical significance was evaluated using the logrank test for univariate influence and Cox model stepwise regression for multivariate influence. Two hundred seventy-eight patients (56%) had primary disease and 222 (44%) recurrent disease. Median follow-up was 28 months (range 1 to 172 months), 40 months for survivors. Median survival was 72 months for patients with primary disease, 28 months for those with local recurrence, and 10 months for those with metastasis. For patients with primary or locally recurrent tumors, unresectable disease, incomplete resection, and high-grade tumors significantly reduced survival time. In this study of patients with retroperitoneal STS, stage at presentation, high histologic grade, unresectable primary tumor, and positive gross margin are strongly associated with the tumor mortality rate. Patients approached with curative intent should undergo aggressive attempts at complete surgical resection. Incomplete resection should be undertaken only for symptom relief.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control.

            To define the optimal initial management and the best extent of surgery that would optimize margins on primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). A total of 382 patients with primary RPS were analyzed. Sixty-five patients had a simple resection of the tumor, 120 patients had a complete compartmental resection (systematic resection of noninvolved contiguous organs), 130 patients had a contiguously involved organ resection, 21 patients had a systematic re-excision, 38 patients had an incomplete gross resection, and eight patients had a biopsy alone. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered to 121 and 145 patients, respectively. One, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86% (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.89), 66% (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.71), and 57% (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.62), respectively. Median overall survival was 6 years. In the multivariate analysis, high grade, tumor rupture, gross residual disease, and positive margins were associated with decreased OS. Low grade, no tumor rupture, negative histologic margins, a high number of patients undergoing operation per center, and compartmental resection compared with standard procedures were associated with decreased abdominal recurrences. Compartmental resection is a significant variable, predicting a 3.29-fold lower rate of abdominal recurrence compared with simple complete resection. Complete compartmental surgery without tumor rupture should be performed when possible to achieve clear margins. This surgery should be performed in a high-volume center. The role of adjuvant treatments should be evaluated in a randomized trial in association with this optimal surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Aggressive surgical policies in a retrospectively reviewed single-institution case series of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients.

              To explore whether the adoption of a systematic attempt to perform wider resections may lead to prognostic improvements in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RSTS). Two hundred eighty-eight consecutive patients who were surgically treated at a single referral center were analyzed. Because a shift toward a systematic, more aggressive surgical approach (ie, liberal en bloc resection of adjacent organs) was in place from 2002 onward, patients were divided in two groups accordingly. Overall survival, crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence, and distant metastases were estimated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out. Patients who underwent operation in the early period had a 5-year local recurrence rate of 48% compared with 28% for patients who were treated in the recent period. The number of distant metastases was greater in the recent group (22% v 13%), and overall survival was similar. In addition to the period of treatment, important independent determinants for local recurrence-free survival were histologic grade, histologic subtype, and radiation therapy. Overall, liposarcomas and grades 1 to 2 tumors had the greatest local benefit at 5 years. In a single institution, the adoption of a policy of more liberal visceral en bloc resections was paralleled by greater local control. This benefit might translate into a prognostic improvement only on a longer follow-up for patients with a more indolent disease, whereas systemic failures seem to be the main problem in high-grade tumors. Radiation therapy could add some additional benefit to local outcome and possibly to survival.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                F.Roeder@dkfz.de
                Alexis.Ulrich@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Gregor.Habl@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Matthias.Uhl@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                LahlaSE@aol.com
                p.huber@dkfz.de
                daniela.ertner@fdk.info
                Anna.Nikoghosyan@helios-kliniken.de
                Ingo.Alldinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                robert.krempien@helios-kliniken.de
                Gunhild.Mechterheimer@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Frank.Hensley@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Juergen.Debus@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Marc.Bischof@slk-kliniken.de
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                27 August 2014
                27 August 2014
                2014
                : 14
                : 1
                : 617
                Affiliations
                [ ]Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Markus Clinic, Frankfurt, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Clinic, Berlin-Buch, Germany
                [ ]Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiation Oncology, SLK Clinic, Heilbronn, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
                Article
                4807
                10.1186/1471-2407-14-617
                4156610
                25163595
                62fecb0f-14bf-40e3-bb28-d8b65fc6f36c
                © Roeder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 May 2014
                : 20 August 2014
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article