2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: analysis of clinical outcomes of patients with 8–10 years follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes up to 10 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

          Methods

          In this retrospective, consecutive, single-center case series the medical files of eyes which have received DMEK between 2009 and 2012 for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction was evaluated regarding follow-up time and clinical outcomes.

          Annual examinations of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT) of 66 eyes which fulfilled the criterion of a minimum of 8 years follow-up were analyzed.

          Results

          BCVA improved from 0.55 ± 0.37 logMAR ( n = 54) to 0.15 ± 0.11 ( n = 47) in eyes without ocular comorbidities one year after DMEK ( p < 0.001), and remained stable up to 10 years after DMEK. Mean ECD decreased to 744 ± 207 cells/mm 2 ( n = 39) after 9 years, and to 729 ± 167 cells/mm 2 ( n = 21) after 10 years, respectively. CCT decreased from 650 ± 67 μm before DMEK to 525 ± 40 μm ( n = 56) after 1 year, increasing slowly to 563 ± 40 µm ( n = 39) after 9 years, and to 570 ± 42 µm ( n = 21) after 10 years, respectively. Graft failure occurred in 4 of 66 eyes after year 8. These 4 eyes required repeat DMEK after 101–127 months.

          Conclusion

          This study shows the long-term outcomes in a small subset of DMEK grafts. Visual acuity remained stable in spite of slowly increasing corneal thickness and diminishing endothelial cell density during the 10-year period after DMEK.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-02176-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking.

          Corneal transplantation restores visual function when visual impairment caused by a corneal disease becomes too severe. It is considered the world's most frequent type of transplantation, but, to our knowledge, there are no exhaustive data allowing measurement of supply and demand, although such data are essential in defining local, national, and global strategies to fight corneal blindness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-Year Review from 2005 through 2014.

            To report evolving indications and preferred techniques of corneal transplantation in the United States.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

              To evaluate visual outcome and endothelial cell survival after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in comparison with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series. Thirty-eight eyes of 38 consecutive patients undergoing DMEK, who completed a 6-month follow-up, were compared with 35 eyes of 35 consecutive patients undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] units) and endothelial cell density within a 6-month follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity increased from 0.70 ± 0.48 logMAR and 0.75 ± 0.32 logMAR before surgery to 0.21 ± 0.14 logMAR and 0.48 ± 0.19 logMAR 3 months after DMEK and DSAEK (P < .001), respectively, and to 0.17 ± 0.12 logMAR and 0.36 ± 0.15 logMAR 6 months after DMEK and DSAEK (P < .001), respectively. Endothelial cell density decreased from 2575 ± 260 cells/mm(2) and 2502 ± 220 cells/mm(2) before surgery to 1498 ± 244 cells/mm(2) and 1778 ± 420 cells/mm(2) 3 months after DMEK and DSAEK (P < .001), respectively, and to 1520 ± 299 cells/mm(2) and 1532 ± 495 cells/mm(2) 6 months after DMEK and DSAEK (P = .483), respectively. Central corneal thickness decreased from 652 ± 92 μm before surgery to 517 ± 45 μm 6 months after DMEK, and from 698 ± 137 μm before surgery to 618 ± 66 μm 6 months after DSAEK. DMEK provided faster and more complete visual rehabilitation when compared with DSAEK. However, there were no significant differences concerning endothelial cell survival within a 6-month follow-up. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                julia.weller@uk-erlangen.de
                Journal
                Int Ophthalmol
                Int Ophthalmol
                International Ophthalmology
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0165-5701
                1573-2630
                8 January 2022
                8 January 2022
                2022
                : 42
                : 6
                : 1789-1798
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.5330.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 3311, Department of Ophthalmology, , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, ; Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-4748
                Article
                2176
                10.1007/s10792-021-02176-3
                9156484
                35000055
                62ba12c1-c067-49d9-8315-e1238ba78b1c
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 July 2021
                : 18 December 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (8546)
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature B.V. 2022

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy,descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (dmek)

                Comments

                Comment on this article