There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine is a cornerstone of treatment
to prevent thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary
intervention.
To compare prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, with clopidogrel, we randomly assigned
13,608 patients with moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndromes with scheduled
percutaneous coronary intervention to receive prasugrel (a 60-mg loading dose and
a 10-mg daily maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a 75-mg
daily maintenance dose), for 6 to 15 months. The primary efficacy end point was death
from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The
key safety end point was major bleeding.
The primary efficacy end point occurred in 12.1% of patients receiving clopidogrel
and 9.9% of patients receiving prasugrel (hazard ratio for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel,
0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.90; P<0.001). We also found significant
reductions in the prasugrel group in the rates of myocardial infarction (9.7% for
clopidogrel vs. 7.4% for prasugrel; P<0.001), urgent target-vessel revascularization
(3.7% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001), and stent thrombosis (2.4% vs. 1.1%; P<0.001). Major bleeding
was observed in 2.4% of patients receiving prasugrel and in 1.8% of patients receiving
clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.68; P=0.03). Also greater in the
prasugrel group was the rate of life-threatening bleeding (1.4% vs. 0.9%; P=0.01),
including nonfatal bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio, 1.25; P=0.23) and fatal
bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P=0.002).
In patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention,
prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events,
including stent thrombosis, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, including
fatal bleeding. Overall mortality did not differ significantly between treatment groups.
(ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097591 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)
Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Although clopidogrel reduces the risk of cardiovascular episodes after coronary events and stenting, a substantial number of incidents continue to occur. The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel was studied prospectively in 60 consecutive patients who underwent primary angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) with stenting for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to determine whether variability in response to clopidogrel affects clinical outcomes. Patients were stratified into 4 quartiles according to the percentage reduction of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Although patients in the first quartile were resistant to the effects of clopidogrel (ADP-induced platelet aggregation at day 6, 103+/-8% of baseline), ADP-induced aggregation was reduced to 69+/-3%, 58+/-7%, and 33+/-12% of baseline, respectively, in patients in quartiles 2 through 4 (P<0.01 for all). In addition, epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation and platelet aggregation under flow conditions, assessed by the cone-and-plate(let) analyzer method, were reduced significantly less in the first quartile than in quartiles 2 through 4. Whereas 40% of patients in the first quartile sustained a recurrent cardiovascular event during a 6-month follow-up, only 1 patient (6.7%) in the second quartile and none in the third and fourth quartiles suffered a cardiovascular event (P=0.007). Up to 25% of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with stenting are resistant to clopidogrel and therefore may be at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events.
Aggregation of platelets is the pathophysiologic basis of the acute coronary syndromes. Eptifibatide, a synthetic cyclic heptapeptide, is a selective high-affinity inhibitor of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which is involved in platelet aggregation. We tested the hypothesis that inhibition of platelet aggregation with eptifibatide would have an incremental benefit beyond that of heparin and aspirin in reducing the frequency of adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes who did not have persistent ST-segment elevation. Patients who had presented with ischemic chest pain within the previous 24 hours and who had either electrocardiographic changes indicative of ischemia (but not persistent ST-segment elevation) or high serum concentrations of creatine kinase MB isoenzymes were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to receive a bolus and infusion of either eptifibatide or placebo, in addition to standard therapy, for up to 72 hours (or up to 96 hours, if coronary intervention was performed near the end of the 72-hour period). The primary end point was a composite of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction occurring up to 30 days after the index event. A total of 10,948 patients were enrolled between November 1995 and January 1997. As compared with the placebo group, the eptifibatide group had a 1.5 percent absolute reduction in the incidence of the primary end point (14.2 percent, vs. 15.7 percent in the placebo group; P=0.04). The benefit was apparent by 96 hours and persisted through 30 days. The effect was consistent in most major subgroups except for women (odds ratios for death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, 0.8 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 0.9] in men, and 1.1 [0.9 to 1.31 in women). Bleeding was more common in the eptifibatide group, although there was no increase in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke. Inhibition of platelet aggregation with eptifibatide reduced the incidence of the composite end point of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes who did not have persistent ST-segment elevation.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.