7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Juntas em um único número na urna? As experiências de mandato coletivo e o desafio à política partidária tradicional e personalista no Brasil (2016-2020) Translated title: Together under a single number in the ballot box? The experiences of collective mandate and the challenge to traditional and personalist party politics in Brazil (2016-2020)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo: O artigo tem por objetivo investigar e refletir sobre as experiências de mandato coletivo no Brasil, em especial da Gabinetona, da Mandata Ativista e das Juntas (2016-2020). Entendemos essas experiências como “tecnologias sócio-políticas inovadoras”, que provocaram mudanças no campo político brasileiro, sendo o principal foco deste artigo a relação estabelecida entre as estratégias de representação política interseccional e o desafio colocado à política partidária tradicional e personalista. Por se tratar de fenômenos recentes, adotamos um design emergente de pesquisa, recorrendo a estratégias combinadas de pesquisa exploratória e em profundidade. A principal fonte de dados utilizada foram as entrevistas semiestruturadas conduzidas com co-parlamentares e outras/os integrantes dos mandatos. Assim, identificamos categorias emergentes como: os elementos impulsionadores das experiências, os seus fatores de sucesso, os efeitos do “reencantamento” com a política, as estratégias de hackeamento da política, e as tensões frente à estrutura partidária. Concluímos que a lógica da ocupação política revela a necessidade de se estar um passo à frente dos limites colocados pelo sistema partidário dominante.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract: The article aims to investigate and reflect on collective mandate experiences in Brazil, in particular the Gabinetona, Mandata Ativista and Juntas mandates (2016-2020). We understand collective mandates to be “innovative socio-political technologies”, which have brought about changes in the Brazilian political field. The focus of this article is on the relationship established between intersectional political representation strategies and the challenge posed to the traditional and personalist political party system in Brazil. As these are still understudied and recent phenomena in Brazilian politics, we adopted an emergent research design, using exploratory and in-depth research strategies. The main source of data used were semi-structured interviews conducted with coparliamentarians and other members of the mandates. We identified emerging categories, such as: the driving elements of the experiments, their success factors, the effects of “re-enchantment” in politics, politics strategies based on “hacking”, and tensions with respect to the party structure. We conclude that the logic of political occupation reveals the need to be one step ahead of the limits placed by the dominant political party system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research

          Most writing on sociological method has been concerned with how accurate facts can be obtained and how theory can thereby be more rigorously tested. In The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss address the equally Important enterprise of how the discovery of theory from data--systematically obtained and analyzed in social research--can be furthered. The discovery of theory from data--grounded theory--is a major task confronting sociology, for such a theory fits empirical situations, and is understandable to sociologists and laymen alike. Most important, it provides relevant predictions, explanations, interpretations, and applications. In Part I of the book, -Generation Theory by Comparative Analysis, - the authors present a strategy whereby sociologists can facilitate the discovery of grounded theory, both substantive and formal. This strategy involves the systematic choice and study of several comparison groups. In Part II, The Flexible Use of Data, - the generation of theory from qualitative, especially documentary, and quantitative data Is considered. In Part III, -Implications of Grounded Theory, - Glaser and Strauss examine the credibility of grounded theory. The Discovery of Grounded Theory is directed toward improving social scientists' capacity for generating theory that will be relevant to their research. While aimed primarily at sociologists, it will be useful to anyone Interested In studying social phenomena--political, educational, economic, industrial-- especially If their studies are based on qualitative data.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Documento para o encontro de especialistas em aspectos da discriminação racial relativos ao gênero

            Tanto os aspectos de gênero da discriminação racial quanto os aspectos raciais da discriminação de gênero não são totalmente apreendidos pelos discursos dos direitos humanos. O presente documento, baseado no crescente reconhecimento de que as discriminações de raça e de gênero não são fenômenos mutuamente excludentes, propõe um modelo provisório para a identificação das várias formas de subordinação que refletem os efeitos interativos das discriminações de raça e de gênero. Este documento também sugere um protocolo provisório a ser seguido, a fim de melhor identificar as situações em que tal discriminação interativa possa ter ocorrido e, além disso, defende que a responsabilidade de lidar com as causas e as conseqüências dessa discriminação deva ser amplamente compartilhada entre todas as instituições de direitos humanos.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rethinking Representation

              Along with the traditional “promissory” form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here “anticipatory,” “gyroscopic,” and “surrogate” representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rbcpol
                Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
                Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Polít.
                Universidade de Brasília. Instituto de Ciência Política (Brasília, DF, Brazil )
                0103-3352
                2178-4884
                2023
                : 40
                : e263122
                Affiliations
                [3] Belo Horizonte Minas Gerais orgnameUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais orgdiv1Departamento de Ciência Política Brazil matos.marlise@ 123456gmail.com
                [2] Poços de Caldas orgnamePontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais orgdiv1Departamento de Relações Internacionais orgdiv2Professora Brazil barbara.angove@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0103-33522023000100203 S0103-3352(23)00004000203
                10.1590/0103-3352.2023.40.263122
                6243c17f-37a0-4e48-bd4a-f398393b7de9

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 11 October 2022
                : 14 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 74, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Artigos

                collective mandates,collective candidacies,shared candidacies,collective mandates in Brazil,Representação política,interseccionalidade,mandato coletivo,candidatura coletiva,candidatura compartilhada,mandatos coletivos no Brasil,Political representation,intersectionality

                Comments

                Comment on this article