1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using Sourcil vs Bone Margin as Anatomic Landmark on False-Profile Radiographs Yields Different ACEA Values: Response

      reply

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Authors’ Response: We appreciate the opportunity to respond to comments from Dr Needell with regard to our article. As noted by him, it is important to acknowledge the history of the anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) measurement. Lequesne and de Seze 3 first described the ACEA using the sourcil as the anterior reference point, and Crockarell et al 1 later described the ACEA using the acetabular bone edge. In our study, 4 we utilized the acetabular bone edge for all ACEA measurements. We agree with Dr Needell that differences in ACEA measurements may exist based on the anterior reference point used. Indeed, we previously published a study 2 addressing this issue, which showed that measuring the ACEA to the bone edge was on average 10° (95% CI, –2° to 22°) greater than the ACEA sourcil measurement. Thus, sourcil and bone-edge measurements should not be used interchangeably. It is possible that the 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic correlate of the bone-edge and sourcil ACEA also differ based on the selected 2D landmark; however, addressing this question was outside the scope of our study. 4 Dr Needell rightly acknowledged that a gold standard has not been established for the ACEA anterior reference point, and it is unknown which measurement is more useful in the context of hip preservation surgical planning. We believe that both sourcil and bone-edge ACEA measurements provide valuable information in characterizing the anterior acetabular rim bony morphology. Regardless, when reporting ACEA values, it is critical that measurement technique be clearly described. Our publication represents an initial effort to clarify the utility of the bone edge ACEA specifically, and it underscores the value added by 3D measurements given the sensitivity of the ACEA to patient position. We are currently in the process of completing a study that will demonstrate the importance of both measurements when evaluating the anterior acetabular coverage. Future work should continue to examine the 3D mapping of ACEA measurements. Stephen K. Aoki, MD Joseph D. Mozingo, PhD Lindsay L. Schuring, MS Andrew E. Anderson, PhD Reece M. Rosenthal, BS Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          [False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies].

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles

            The lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and the anterior center edge angle (ACEA) are commonly used to assess acetabular coverage of the femoral head. There are two distinct methods found in the literature to obtain these angles, specifically, measuring to the most lateral bone edge versus the sclerotic lateral sourcil edge. A difference between these two methods may contribute to inconsistent estimates of acetabular coverage, and potentially lead to clinical misdiagnosis and treatment mismanagement. The objectives of this study were to quantify the difference between bone edge and sourcil edge measurements and to determine how the difference influences the classification of acetabular coverage in adult patients with suspected hip pathomorphology. Two observers completed the measurements independently using preoperative anteroposterior and false profile radiographs. Bland–Altman plots and paired t-tests were used to compare measurement methods. Bone and sourcil measurements of the LCEA and ACEA were significantly different (both P < 0.001). On average, the bone LCEA was 4° (95% limits of agreement = −2° to 10°) greater than the sourcil LCEA. The bone ACEA was, on average, 10° (95% limit of agreement = −2° to 22°) greater than the sourcil ACEA. The differences often led to different clinical classifications for the same hip. With a statistically and clinically significant difference in the quantification of acetabular coverage using bone edge versus sourcil edge methods for measuring the LCEA and ACEA in adult patients, it should be mandatory to clearly identify which method was used in each study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The anterior centre-edge angle. A cadaver study.

              The anterior centre-edge (VCA) angle quantifies the anterior cover of the femoral head, and angles of less than 20 degrees are considered abnormal. We have measured the VCA angles in hips without osteoarthritic changes. We took bilateral false-profile radiographs of nine female and 30 male cadavers without signs of osteoarthritis. The mean age at the time of death was 72 years (46 to 92). The mean VCA angle was 32.8 degrees (17.7 to 53.6). The SD was 7.9 degrees. Our findings suggest that the threshold of abnormality of the VCA angle may be slightly lower than previously thought. This information may be useful in counselling patients with asymptomatic acetabular dysplasia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthop J Sports Med
                Orthop J Sports Med
                OJS
                spojs
                Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2325-9671
                25 July 2022
                July 2022
                : 10
                : 7
                : 23259671221112438
                Affiliations
                [1-23259671221112438]Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Stephen K. Aoki, MD (email: stephen.aoki@ 123456hsc.utah.edu ).
                Article
                10.1177_23259671221112438
                10.1177/23259671221112438
                9326831
                623c5b4f-3dd0-4a40-822e-d1f0aad0db26
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ts3

                Comments

                Comment on this article