9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indicating that the use of an escalating dose of an oral misoprostol solution is associated with a lower rate of caesarean sections and a better safety profile. The objective of this study is to assess which of these three therapeutic options (oral or vaginal misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone) achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery within the first 24 h of drug administration.

          Methods

          An open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Araba University Hospital (Spain). Women at ≥41 weeks of pregnancy requiring elective induction of labour who meet the selection criteria will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: 1) vaginal dinoprostone (delivered via a controlled-release vaginal insert containing 10 mg of dinoprostone, for up to 24 h); 2) vaginal misoprostol (25 μg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 h up to a maximum of 24 h); and 3) oral misoprostol (titrated doses of 20 to 60 μg of misoprostol following a 3 h on + 1 h off regimen up to a maximum of 24 h). Both intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis will be performed.

          Discussion

          The proposed study seeks to gather evidence on which of these three therapeutic options achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery with the best safety profile, to enable obstetricians to use the most effective and safe option for their patients.

          Trial registration

          NCT02902653 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02902653 (7th September 2016).

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.

          Various methods are used for cervical ripening during the induction of labour. It is still debatable which of these methods of treatment is optimal.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

            Misoprostol (Cytotec, Searle) is a prostaglandin E1 analogue widely used for off-label indications such as induction of abortion and of labour. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.

              Misoprostol is an orally active prostaglandin. In most countries misoprostol is not licensed for labour induction, but its use is common because it is cheap and heat stable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                OIHANE.LAPUENTEOCAMICA@osakidetza.eus
                lorea.ugarterubio@osakidetza.eus
                amanda.lopezpicado@gmail.com
                Flor.sanchezrefoyo@gmail.com
                +34 945 00 72 04 , luisignacio.letelasa@osakidetza.eus
                OLGA.ECHEVARRIALOPEZ@osakidetza.eus
                JAVIER.ALVAREZ-SALATORREANO@osakidetza.eus
                AIDA.FARINASDOVAO@osakidetza.eus
                inaki.bilbaogonzalez@osakidetza.eus
                LAURA.BARBEROCUBILLAS@osakidetza.eus
                Janire.vicarreguiolabarrieta@osakidetza.eus
                Roberto.hernanzchaves@osakidetza.eis
                Daniel.pazcorral@osakidetza.eus
                JOSEANGEL.LOPEZLOPEZ@osakidetza.eus
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                8 January 2019
                8 January 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Araba University Hospital, Jose Atxotegui s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
                [2 ]Bioaraba Research Unit, Jose Atxotegui s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 0974, GRID grid.468902.1, Araba Research Unit, , University Hospital Araba, ; c/ Jose Atxotegui s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
                [4 ]GRID grid.414780.e, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Unit, , Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), ; C/ Profesor Martin Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                [5 ]Department of Pediatrics, Araba University Hospital, Jose Atxotegui s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
                [6 ]Pharmacy Department, Araba University Hospital, Jose Atxotegui s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
                Article
                2132
                10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3
                6325751
                30621614
                6173e970-9cd8-46f2-b12f-432bec77b96b
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 30 January 2017
                : 3 December 2018
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                induction,labour,misoprostol,dinoprostone,efficacy,safety
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                induction, labour, misoprostol, dinoprostone, efficacy, safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article